SYNOPSIS AND SUMMARY OF THE LAW SUIT ON RUSH LIMBAUGH; SEAN HANNITY AND ALL COHORTS: 2010

SYNOPSIS AND SUMMARY OF THE LAW SUIT ON RUSH LIMBAUGH AND SEAN HANNITY: SURROGATES ARE SUE AND CHRIS YOUNG AND OTHERS. WE WISH TO BE PAID FOR OUR PROBLEMS AND ARE SEEKING 550 MILLION IN A CIVIL SUIT BECAUSE WE HAVE A RIGHT TO DEMAND SOME FORM OF PAYMENT FOR THIS AND AN END TO IT.

"http://anncoulterloves.blogspot.com/2010/04/synopsis-of-520-million-dollar-lawsuit.html"

___________________________



___________________________


I developed Satellite Warfare to combat the spread of nuclear weapons and we have shorted the gap between nuclear and conventional forces; no longer needed in my book. There are approximately 200 chapters. Most were written and researched while in college from 1988 to 1998; I researched it by taking over 190 credits from different universities. They also span from childhood reading since age 8 and up (military science, weapons, martial arts, etc...) I have been getting ideas from people about doing a complete series; all at once. They start off with pure science and ends with a complete understanding of where this world is headed and two particular topics called economic sustainability and totality; then it introduces the reader to a new series of books on satellite warfare; the science and the art. Naturally, they call me the father of satellite warfare and I have put in over 20 years to this field of knowledge; perhaps the best in the world, but my readers will judge who is the best in their world. To get here; we have taken harsh punishments, suffered torture, was kidnapped, humiliated hourly, and had our life trashed and rewritten by no fault of our own. That is called terrorism. That is called war.


Search key words or topics on this blog...

Thursday, January 15, 2009

THE SEAN HANNITY SHOW ON JAN 15 BY PRINCESS (AIRBUS CRAS IN HUDSON RIVER)

Sean Hannity Show: 1/15/2009 10:10:58 PM

There is a sense Sean Hannity is becoming the wrong person with the right message. His good deeds far outweigh the bad deeds or something not known. Most if not all of his criticism is now properly aligned where it was once very questionable. However, the self criticism is not being addressed; a person who is involved in a lot of mischief but not concerned the slightest about how serious the self criticism was about. Rush calls this “an honest mistake that cannot be discussed.”

Sean, I will give you some advice. Nobody criticizes your wife and why or what motives you have in marrying her. That said, nobody puts pressure on your wife to not talk to you or for her to get lost and leave you alone because that is your best interest. If anybody did try that, you may be shocked and angered by the arrogance and the near insanity of those whose voices are already annoying. So when you say “he has nothing” or “what does she see in him”; you ought to look at your own life and how satisfied you are in it. Even if you were miserable, nobody would go to your wife and harass her or prevent her from talking to you because they wanted to do you harm and kidnap you. The problem is what you knew and how you knew; then what you did or tried to do thinking that a sham or some fraud of trickery could be accomplished so long as nobody could catch you all. That is the entire plot and the kidnappers; they are so good and so sneaky; they are not cacheable.

To go to someone’s spouse and say what you all said is a clear sign of severe psychosis. To watch how you did it and who it was linked to indicated the sources and this terror plot we were chasing down and trying to wait for someone to show up. We knew you were going to show up and did. You also contacted the investigators who set traps and were monitoring channels to make sure the elusive enemy we were looking for would expose themselves first and could be lured down a path where more was brought out. Ann is working on my case and I am working on hers but the core of the plot is the same because the information flowed to her, a profile was built based on what we learned and you fit perfectly of who we were expecting and did show up.

Ann wounded you and you wanted to be treated or healed. The wound was so bad you were nearly screaming and in a fit of rage. The amount of pain you were in was not recoverable but you managed to recover. When Ann knew she had the right person and someone who knew or was a plotter; she wounded you. Your pursuit of her was tremendous; I would compare it to stalking by the most deranged and dangerous elements. Ann also said the intent was to do harm and inflict serious harm on her and she was trying to communicate and ask for help but it was being denied cut down. When you hold someone hostage and they try to escape or seek help; terrorists and dangerous people act a certain way. Your message now about dangerous terrorists and radicals does not fit the messenger.

10:43:20 PM what you did was display the same dangerous or vicious type of behavior on another human being who you wanted something from but could not get it. Now you act as if we want something from you and cannot get it either. (Holder) “We do not want to criminalize the matter about what happened and the new administration” 10:45:54 PM We also need to stop comparing World War II to other wars or different situations. It is an important war but it must not be applied to all situations and used to persuade a desired outcome which benefits a history of victimization.

The handling of the emergency crash landing of the Airbus jet is not only professional; it highlights the other side of Sean Hannity. He is as good as it gets and his coverage of the situation merits a perfect 10, so we will stop and end this session here to show a degree of both politeness and respect. I have to say that these 911 like scenes can raise the level of any person and transform them from a criminal, terrorist, or threat into a super hero and that is why they are so dangerous. However, there is a limit on anything and grace under pressure so we will stop here.

No comments:

Blog Archive