“UNABOMBER” MARK LEVIN ON THE RUSH LIMBAUGH SHOW: WHAT IS CONSERVATISM AND WHY HAS IT BEEN HIJACKED OR OCCUPIED BY CHANGE? MAR 25, 2009

"Liberty and Tryanny" by Mark Levin:

Mark Levin comes on to defend Bush Limbo and this inner circle… does he know a crime has taken place and will he steal the situation from the jaws of victory? 3/25/2009 8:47:13 AM Mark Levin needs to understand his book will be a legend and passed from one generation to the next, that was the intent of the book. This terror group, rival, and undercover “hero” were grading me a “D” for the book stating how it lacked “citations” and “a thorough investigation” or “researched improperly.” However, my partner Ann Coulter has taken care of the criticism and the “lack of research” or “lack of historical notes.” I even asked her to address this and said they did not take it serious and they felt they are stars and “too big to be wrong.”

People know my book is the real deal and our work is the real deal, which these bozos are I have yet to figure out. I got a “D” grade on the original book while they tried to steal it and what we were working on. They trashed it and tried to steal it, rewrite it and put their names on it, and would not give me any credit. Mark Levin is going to defend them and his “one stop book” which is to match it. The crime has already been committed; now the problem is how to explain it or if there is any need to explain. Caller says, “you are great employees… affect everybody” and Rush says, “at least you got it right… growing by leaps and bounds (his growth is a good thing)… “

I have no idea who Mark Levin is and never talked to him or dealt with him. “Has a full time job and only time can write it… “This is why I wrote mine at age 20-28. Mine took eight years and a lot of college research. I am glad Mr. Levin has stepped up to the plate as a credible rival and is going to defend the honor of Bush Limbaugh, “no crime has been committed.” Mark Levin was never in the satellite warfare program or this project. I have not and never asked for research notes or logistics or has he asked to plug into this. I have never asked him, Ann Coulter has never asked him, or has ever been in the logistical system of the satellite warfare program, who is he and what is his goal?

States we are a fraud and hijacked his movement. We run satellite warfare and want him and this group gone, or captured dead or alive as terrorists and charges outlined. “We have hijacked” he claims. “Trying to rewrite conservatism… keeping it to Hamilton, Jefferson… has a duty to support… Edmund Burke is so crucial… change is radical and destroys the society… why we fight it off (Unabomber manifesto origins)… must have a moral order… means to an end… there are not three braches to conservatism… legitimately denied them… rights rationed… if do not agree, take them away (Truth)… exploits something… man is imperfect… so institutions imperfect… so man exploits this.”

Okay this is not an education but a defense of Judaism. He is saying Judaism is conservatism and the Constitution. He is saying the Constitution resists change and is designed to resist change. He claims they are the fathers of satellite warfare and the heart of the military. Obviously they are trying a hijacking and a theft, after the crime. They do not want to “surrender their independence… promoting this quiet revolution… (Says we are revolutionists or radicals)… don’t know until we try our way… never know until we reach these people… (Rush says to attract them and lure them) challenge them… to deceive… on a dime they march… fighting with each other… debating about nonsense.“

Nobody is plugging into him; he is pushing some fraud and crime committed. We do not want him; he wants to say he is our logistics. I cannot fire or get rid of him or Rush. The reason is we are fighting over nonsense and they are “conservatives.” Well, then I and we quit conservatives. So now he cannot claim he is logistics and cannot be fired, his argument is disproved as false. He is occupying a lie and we let it go with him along with it. He does not claim to be the father of satellite warfare, says he is logistics and we are unfairly attacking him or “them.” They do not want to give up their individual liberties; before or after the crime. Says, they are coming to the rescue not us (911 plots to save New York).

Okay, this jackass is pissing me off running around pretending to be some rescue and the father of satellite warfare. He is not logistics and is not a researcher; he is a rival and trying to disprove our work. He is saying conservatism is merely the rejection of change; that is all. It is the same as the Unabomber Manifesto (I can quote it). Change is either internal or external and he is only saying confidence. Says they are “suffering” and are occupying conservatism with the products of his labor. Has not come out to say it is an imitation but has not addressed the issues; only him. Again, like Obama and liberals, refuses to address the issues because it is change. He is against change and is occupying conservatism to cooperate with other conservatives. Fed up with listening to a hijacking and a total fraud pretending to be me or stealing my self identity again! This book is a travesty of the truth and rejection of the truth! I am turning it off now!