HOW WILL THEY HELP? WHEN DID THEY KNOW? HOW CLOSE ARE THEY TO THE TWO? HOW DO YOU KNOW BOTH? WHEN DID YOU KNOW BOTH? BUSTED; 4.11.2010

There is a criminal and negligent facade along with all of this which suggests the goal is extortion. While the claim is to help; the spy cameras and illegal surveillance remained a problem and security steps had to be taken to ensure that information did not fall in the hands of the wrong people. When the lewd or disgusting behavior began to "encourage" a sense of disgust; the sensation of being violated became real and security steps had to be taken to ensure this did not fall in the wrong hands or used improperly. Not only was there the presence of a murder plot, incessant bullying, stalking, intimidation, obstruction of justice and a terror plot; the sensation of helplessness or losing was used back for retaliation. An example is "helping." Everybody involved claims they are doing or there "to help." However they type of help or the legal help needed was always absent. It appeared to be a form of excuse to stonewalling to extort money, favors, valuable information, or to carry on this political experience that was intended to punish any subjects trapped in the danger. There is a denial of stalking or shadowing; but instead a victim status of being "set up" or "lured" into this dangerous "help." The entire case is based on trying to help and stalking charges or illegal surveillance-peeping tom charges. There is a clear history of reading legal briefs and commenting on their own prosecution; clearly the presence of spy cameras; then distributing information collected.

Another example is the rent. With clear violation of the terms and obvious demand for a refund to seek a new location or safe residence away from this criminal conspiracy after it was discovered; the sensation of being dejected, stepped on, violated, and stonewalled furthered the extortion plot and this political experience. Again, all of these people are there to "help" but the right help never arrives or is offered. When demands for how to help is described; there is a stonewalling and a sensation it is a criminal conspiracy to extort. The terror plots uncovered were intended to socialize medicine and attack the Pentagon; now it was to hit a home run once socialized Metycaine was passed and to carry out this political experience. How would a property owner deal with death threats, relentless bullying, spy cameras, illegal surveillance, sex tapes, and this form of violating of a human being on his property or being carried out against one of the tenants who pays him rent? What does he expect the tenant to do or is there also punitive damages for carrying it out? The existence of the spy cameras, reading legal and official business mail, bank accounts and financial information, etc... is enough reason to suggest the behavior of those involved indicate a criminal conspiracy at the highest levels.

It is not wanting to help; it is how they helped that is most important and shows who they are. It goes from this end (landlord and those on property behind the spy camera or illegal surveillance), to the State of New York, to Sean and Rush, then to their employers, YAF and CPAC, FReeP, and all of Ann's associates. Surely they wanted to help but we clearly know now how they helped and what they did. It also suggest how rotten they are and using "help" to extort from others or abuse their powers. Not only was there a cover up, it clearly shows they tried to drum up or cater to a "post-arrangement" that would circumvent the laws once lawlessness and a crime spree was detected. The question after December 2009 was who was keeping them in-near a criminal conspiracy and why no measures were ever taken to at minimum get them away from or escape it. Why is there an effort to further it? Nobody wanted to buy their products and now they felt a high school diploma was enough to read our legal mail and comment at will or all day long.