ANALYSIS OF THE BOOK, “UNITED IN HATE” BY JAMIE GLAZOV. IS THE ENEMY AS DEFINABLE AS HE WRITES SO EASILY OR IS THIS A TRICK OF THE MIND AS WE KNOW VC

4/3/2009 11:31:45 PM There are a lot of cruelty on earth such as child molestation, gay preachers, and rape. It is not solely in “Islamic regimes” as the author of “United in Hate” is trying to relay. Evil exists in Islamic countries also and there is a lot of evil in America, a lot. On the contrary, Islamic countries cannot “hire a PR firm” because they do not have the funds, they only have oil.

Let me also note that violence can reach over 500 murders in a single city in the United States. On the crime rate of violent crimes Africa has the most and the worst on children and women. Crime is not rampant in “Islamic nations” solely. There is more violent crimes and crimes in New York City than Istanbul.

The book “United in Hate” by Jamie Glazov is not a serious work on Islam or communism. It is a clever way to sell propaganda and Israel, the cause behind the 911 event. I hate 911 because of the attacks on the Pentagon not NYC. To me it is nuts and we cannot turn off these nuts. This author is another dissident spy from the Soviet Union intent on spreading propaganda and refusing to correct it or print the truth.

The book is odd and disconnected for this reason:
1 Define for me what a perfect world is and then define for me an imperfect one. This is his central theme, leftist wish to die for a perfect world. So right wingers do not wish to die for a imperfect world? Why do people fight wars? Is it to destroy their world or build a better and more perfect one?
2 I have studied “the enemy” since age 6. Do not tell me I do not know the enemies or VC. I am an expert on VC. Now this author is going to define for me VC? He is going to tell me who VC is and lead me to their headquarters? So how can he define the “enemies?”
3 All leftists celebrated 911? Is there proof and data of this or their true feelings when the bombs from the US arrived?
4 This author is nuts about chemical and biological attacks. It is a threat and is used in warfare; however, Israel is that threat. We know the left to have socialized medicine on their top 3 of to do list. I have injuries from chemical and biological “VC” if he wishes to see them. They are not in “Islamic” heaven either.
5 The author says, “My leftist friends?” Explain that one and how he can stand them while an authority on the topic or how reformed they are? This enemy is not reformed in religious terms or heresy.

After hearing this author and the authority he brings to his world; it felt like he had this figured out and was ordering me around. I felt stupid and he spoke in a very condescending manner full of mistakes. If this enemy is as definable as he says, then there would be advertisements for them or some ad. Why would it be such a threat if it was so easily definable, corrects it?