SYNOPSIS AND SUMMARY OF THE LAW SUIT ON RUSH LIMBAUGH; SEAN HANNITY AND ALL COHORTS: 2010

SYNOPSIS AND SUMMARY OF THE LAW SUIT ON RUSH LIMBAUGH AND SEAN HANNITY: SURROGATES ARE SUE AND CHRIS YOUNG AND OTHERS. WE WISH TO BE PAID FOR OUR PROBLEMS AND ARE SEEKING 550 MILLION IN A CIVIL SUIT BECAUSE WE HAVE A RIGHT TO DEMAND SOME FORM OF PAYMENT FOR THIS AND AN END TO IT.

"http://anncoulterloves.blogspot.com/2010/04/synopsis-of-520-million-dollar-lawsuit.html"

___________________________



___________________________


I developed Satellite Warfare to combat the spread of nuclear weapons and we have shorted the gap between nuclear and conventional forces; no longer needed in my book. There are approximately 200 chapters. Most were written and researched while in college from 1988 to 1998; I researched it by taking over 190 credits from different universities. They also span from childhood reading since age 8 and up (military science, weapons, martial arts, etc...) I have been getting ideas from people about doing a complete series; all at once. They start off with pure science and ends with a complete understanding of where this world is headed and two particular topics called economic sustainability and totality; then it introduces the reader to a new series of books on satellite warfare; the science and the art. Naturally, they call me the father of satellite warfare and I have put in over 20 years to this field of knowledge; perhaps the best in the world, but my readers will judge who is the best in their world. To get here; we have taken harsh punishments, suffered torture, was kidnapped, humiliated hourly, and had our life trashed and rewritten by no fault of our own. That is called terrorism. That is called war.


Search key words or topics on this blog...

Sunday, October 19, 2008

IS ANN COULTER TAKING UNECESSARY RISKS AND SHOOTING BLANKS?

10/19/2008 8:32:58 PM

• Is Ann Coulter guilty of infidelity? No.
• Is Ann Coulter interested? No (she is in a 20 year relationship and taken)
• Is Ann Coulter guilty of breaking communication silence? No and yes.
• Is Ann Coulter guilty of breaking security policy? Yes.
• Are her stalkers still lying and saying she is interested? Unknown.
• Are they still up to the usual? Unknown, Rush is saying lighten up.
• Are they willing to exonerate or fix things? No.
• Is she avoiding our legal cases against them? Yes.
• Are they still stalking us and in our life? Yes.
• Did they kidnap her? No. Did they kidnap me? Yes.
• Do they still have “with us or with the terrorist” policy for socialism still? No.
• Is she annoying me? Yes trying to prove her again and again or sneaking around trying to act sneaky or to show how sneaky she is. That is what she is doing, trying to show off how sneaky she is to me and I am ready to punch her. It was a bad performance and her stalkers busted her up. They are not bawling their brains out or ready to jump off no bridge. Who is?
• Is she taking unnecessary risk or increasing the potential of problems? Yes.
• Is Ann Coulter taking unnecessary risk because she sympathizes with the stalkers, sex offenders, and moles? No she hates them like death.
• Does she want them gone and out of our life? Yes.
• For some reason she wishes to ask for an apology from terrorists and hardcore sex offenders by taking these unnecessary risks. They all are on a list and being positively identified.
• She took unnecessary risk and an image problem with having drinks with strangers, stalkers, and creating this wild image when she was taken and already in a long term relationship. Now it is biting back.
• She is guilty and blamed for taking unnecessary risk because of a personal or emotional breakdown. She has gone mad and now being blamed for these unnecessary risks if she is able to think clearly. She is poking them and chiding them to ask for an apology from terrorists and she feels she needs it.
• For some reason she feels drinking buddies was needed, an apology is needed, and more risk taking needed. There is a fine line in war and fights that say when you are so busted up that your own security is punching you, stupidity sets in quick. The real fighters and bad subordinates are different. One wins and one only wish to get more beaten up. It is useless and worthless but some effort to say she is not gutless. It is sheer stupidity and machismo from a female.
• Nobody risks everything for an apology or to stick a finger in the eye of a terrorist when they are also watching her and in her home. Now they are telling her and us to lighten up and this is all horse shit. She is acting stupid to an even more stupid person thinking she will not loose it all or risk taking will not have any impact on her whatsoever. It is just stupid pride and ignorance from weaklings and subordinates who refuse to listen or clean their act up.
• Does it feel like I am herding them to her? Yes. Is she shooting off blanks? Yes. Is she taking risks and shooting blanks? Maybe.

That is the problem with Ann and why she can be a big pain in the ass when hanging around big risk takers. This is her way of saying she is one also even if it is unnecessary. In war or a real conflict, a sniper would take her in a few seconds. You do not break security policy for apologies or to tinker and play with dangerous terrorists. When someone thinks they are a daredevil and wants to stick their head in a tank of sharks, the urge to kick them in is very tempting. Now that is more entertaining. She is guilty and too self reliant or independent to please anybody. I am beginning to understand what the problem is and why I have all these stalker problems all the sudden. I told her that when I am able and have strength, I will seek a better life and a more peaceful one; I will try to find a good spouse who I can relate to better and not always question. She causes people to have a lot of doubt in her because of unnecessary risk taking. She is cosigning it with me.

No comments: