GOOGLE RUSH LIMBAUGH AND LISA DE PASQUALE

Sunday, November 23, 2008


Google Rush and Lisa. Rush is insanely jealous. Lisa is... (mistress or spouse of Ann and Rush or is Ann)? They almost got away with it, until Ann flashed her ID card. They were stalking either Ann or I to politico. They pretended to be guards or right wing and protectors. Then pretended as if someone was stalking Ann to criticize her and silence her. I rump their roost and they cancel 40-50 accts on politico.com which makes them co conspirators. When did Rush contact me? Never heard of him before 2006, Hannity also. Ann and I thought the coast was clear after 2000 and W. We were wrong, they had a back up. It did not end yet even in 2008. Google Lisa and Rush and you will see something and why. Read the level of lies and how clever they are. It is disgusting and you will puke. They are serial killers and sadistic psychopathic. Who is their backup? Clinton, right now she is his anchor. I have yet to figure this out. It morphs and changes. They are one network and entirety, huge. Google their behavior in 2008. Listen to my story and Ann's, she gets real near them to confirm; she sits down and interviews them. Watch how good she is and how clever they are.

Shocking stuff found today:

It is worth noting that Floyd Resnick, Director of CPAC Security, is also Ann Coulter's personal bodyguard and that CPAC Director Lisa De Pasquale is also one of Ann Coulter's publicists. They are seeking to silence me, a conservative who is critical of Ann Coulter. On March 3, 2007, I received a certified letter from CPAC refunding my registration fee. They had mailed it on Saturday, February 24, 2007, but it didn't arrive at the Odenton Post Office until March 2, 2007, while I was at CPAC. I did not receive that letter until Saturday, March 3, 2007, the day after being accosted at the CPAC convention. In that letter, Lisa De Pasquale cites my “past behavior at CPAC” as the reason for not permitting me at CPAC, without describing what that behavior was. It was, of course, my CPAC 2002 press kit critical of Ann Coulter.

http://www.lydiacornell.com/2007/03/ann-coulters-criminal-intent.html




Counter-Coulter
By Brad Friedman

January/February 2006 Issue


http://www.motherjones.com/news/outfront/2006/01/counter-coulter.html

Then, into this spectacle of spittle and disputum came an email from the gentlemanly Daniel Borchers, expressing that he was (and notice the archaic restraint) “highly critical of Ann Coulter.” Borchers is, if you will, the anti-Coulter, a position he arrives at from a decidedly unexpected corner. He loathes the queen of contumely not because he’s a liberal who’s taken the bait, but because he’s a conservative who thinks she and her kin are a disgrace to the conservative movement.

Borchers works for a labor-management organization dealing with health and safety issues, headquartered in Washington, D.C. He fashions himself an old-school conservative, and has been on a singularly lonely fight for true conservative values and policymaking in America for quite a few years. In 1996, he began publishing a newsletter called BrotherWatch, to combat what he describes as the “growing extremism within the Conservative Movement.” It runs stories about and interviews with personalities from across the broad political spectrum, “from Alan Keyes to Alan Colmes,” says Borchers.

...When the organizers of CPAC caught on to Borchers’ subversive content, they attempted to confiscate BrotherWatch and escorted Borchers out of the hall and back to his Nissan Altima. Coulter has been a perennial star of CPAC, which has wanted nothing to do with Borchers from there on out. In 2003 and 2004, he was denied not only media credentials but even regular admission to the conference. He managed to slip past the gatekeepers in 2005 as a paying member of the public. All this, he says, “merely for expressing my dissent.”

http://www.motherjones.com/news/outfront/2006/01/counter-coulter.html#comments_top