SUMMARY STATEMENTS AND THE IMPACT ON ANN COULTER OR ALEX NGUYEN: WHAT THE TOTALITY DID, WHO WAS LIABLE, AND THE ENTIRETY; 4.22.2010

They claim it is a death sentence and if they confess, is another death sentence, double jeopardy. They use the environment to morph and erase their evil. They use public funds, public institutions, the police, the legal system, and public office to impose sanctions, disrupt, and then erase their sins similar to the church of charity. Ask skeptics, they ride the wave of anger or discontent, "they should just blow it up and not even bother, it is a waste of time." So the blame and the trail is now easily hidden and untraceable. As flawed as they are and as guilty, they can make a clean getaway and use the value of the police and political dominance. The same victory was developed in Vietnam and the fall of Saigon.

http://cyberwarfarehq.blogspot.com/2010/04/summary-statements-and-impact-on-ann.html

http://cyberwarfarehq.blogspot.com/2010/04/summary-statements-and-impact-on-ann.html

Drafted again! This time for peace, love, suicide missions, terror plots, profit, hippies-liberals, Clinton, NG U why E ends, and the new communism or 1960s Revolution:


LA Guns, Ocean City, MD: 1999 (Masters of Metal Concert) Bar had 25 pple and I am the one who sang every song and went crazy! PFC R Picard, US Army from Kennebunkport, ME; LA Guns 1992 in Georgia.

DAVID FRUM, SEAN HANNITY, AND MICHELLE MALKIN; WHAT THEIR BOOKS ARE INTENDED TO FOCUS ON OR ADDRESS; WHAT WE CAUGHT THEM FOR; APR 3, 2010

This is why his book is very suspicious and involves voter fraud! It is similar to Sean Hannity and Michelle Malkin. Sean Hannity is focusing on "Economic Sustainability." Michelle Malkin is focusing on "The Culture of Corruption." She is focusing on the tail end of economic sustainability and what the CIA calls, "Voter Fraud, Delinking, and usurping elections." Those three books complete the cycle of "Economic Sustainability" and the internal document written by two authors which link satellite warfare and economic sustainability to guage power and military forces by the CIA and Pentagon. They are address the voter fraud complaints. This is what the Pentagon called, "synergism" or the power of three.

What Women Don’t Want by David Frum: "What makes that environment so adverse? Let me focus on just one thing for now: the changing social position of women. A generation ago, women in the United States, U.K. and Canada had on average attained lower levels of formal schooling than men. Today, a majority of new university graduates in all three societies are female. A generation ago, most women in these societies lived most of their lives in marriage. Marriage rates in all societies have sharply declined: The majority of U.S. households for example are now headed by unmarried persons, either single or cohabiting. These changes have huge implications for both the substance and the style of politics — but not always obvious implications. John McCain looked at those trends, for example, and decided that the answer to his problems in the 2008 presidential campaign was a female running mate. But after an initial burst of enthusiasm, women voters soon turned on Sarah Palin. Palin remains to this day significantly less popular with women than she is with men: Even among Republicans, half of all women regard her as unqualified for the presidency."

THE SEAN BIN BUSTED SHOW: WHY ANN COULTER LOOKS JUST AS BAD AS THE INFERIOR SLAVE BREED; WHO IS THE PHONY, FAKE, LOSER, AND LIAR HERE? MAR 12, 2010

THE DANA PERINO FAN CLUB BLOG AND VIDEOS POSTINGS! TWITTER BY DANA: http://twitter.com/DanaPerino
___________________________________________________________________

Ann should know that she is dealing with sucidal and death penalty candidates. The damage they have done to her life and mine in the past three years is a clear sign they intend and had intended on causing permanent and deadly damages on our life. So what Ann does, the little details and the snide comments, can only hurt her and her cause. Even if she put a gun to their head and said "look what you did"; they would laugh and tell her she was crazy or had a mental illness. That is how they are and that is the communists. They also do this to America and the nation. So you have to be careful with suicidal terrorists because even if nobody volunteers to do the dirty work; it can be overkill, pointless, and continuous shooting in the foot. Copying them does explain what is happening to them or look in the mirror; but it does not facilitate their arrest or capture. So what will? What about this enemy do they fear? Do they fear Ann Coulter? No. Do they care for or about Ann Coulter? No. Do they wish Ann Coulter well? No. Is she trying to prove her pride or do photo ops as if she is in the face of deadly terrorists or impress little kids about how brave she is? No. They are arguing on this end the more confused and delusional they get. They hold on to her tighter each and every single time she talks to them, looks at them, or sits in the same place or room as them. Are they all irrational and fighting, yes. Are they all angry and trying to play games, yes. Are they all liars, yes. Do they make others miserable and lack any respect for human beings, yes. Are they paying Ann to gain influence in my life and claiming how things are good now, yes. It feels like a squirt gun fight while real terrorist shoot real bullets at us. Ann can take them into court right now and stop them in their tracks or force their hands; but she fights too hard and is so crazy mad to do this; she has to stop them using the only weapons they do not fear or has caused her so much grief. Does that sound like a warrior or a traitor? So why would my number 2 do such a thing? Ann was and has been imposing all of this on me while pleading for me to stay with her; it was insanity to begin with. She claims she is trying to keep me away from it and protect me from those who were doing it to me; is she being truthful or disingenuous? She was and did get in their face and they put a Fatwa or murder plot on her for it.

So is Ann that good or smart? Why not cut her losses and cut the safety line she has on them; she is pulling others in too close, why loose it all? Is Ann fighting heavily with this enemy, no. Is she taking a strong stance or a zero tolerance with them, no. Is she throwing her life away and rubbing elbows with them, yes. Why? Why lower your life down to their level and take it even lower and make it worse? Why not dump a drink on them or tell them to get their slimy hands off you instead of going to dinner with each and every one of them and then seeking forgiveness or repentance? Who is this stupid and this senseless? So if they merely join forces and our team; they can win also? Listen to the stuff they are saying to each other and why; meanwhile, the real victims are sitting and waiting for a rescue. Each of their families is taken down a dangerous road where starvation and retaliation is more and more real. Why would anybody want to match a crack dealer or try to beat a street hooker? It just does not make any sense and day after day; none of them make any sense. Are they hard fighters? No. All they do is sit and talk, feel good, copy everybody else, and try to steal everything they get their hands on. Ann can sit there and say how she is showing or exposing their mistakes; however, when it comes to people who are deadly terrorists, communist spies, lunatic thieves, and captured or ready to fall; what difference does it make but good photo ops and fake stories by some white ass Hollywood script writer. There are real victims and permanent injuries; why all the feel good celebration while a waiting process is endless and a stalemate? They said they are ready for anything we have, ready to die, do not know what to do, want us to leave, shut up, and are now a loose cannon so it will get worse. So who is the phony, the fake, and the liar here? Why are they in our life or America if they are a slave breed and so inferior?

Can Ann go into court and show them how they acted after being caught and busted? Yes. Can she prove they intended on inflicting deadly or permanent damage? Yes. Can she prove they acted in a manner so heinous, they show who they truly are and the grotesque length they will go to in order to achieve this permanent damage on others? Yes. Can it be proved they have no respect for human beings? Yes. Can it be proved they have ruined or intended to ruin others with this feel good politics and pretend as if they are helping or fighting harder? Yes. So why do all of them have their jobs and why is a slander case for over 515 million dollars not forced upon them or ripping them up at this time? Ann is too much of a gambler, much like a thief or phony, and is just like them or in the same boat; she just happens to be on the winning side or have a case-judgment on them. Ann let's people do whatever they want and expects the same; just a total lack of care or sensibility. There is a huge surplus of these types already and an effort to rid all of them; why is she screaming at us? The message from Ann is unconditional love and defense of all them; to scratch her back if they wish their back scratched also. Ann is trying to sell this to the military, royals, and the highest levels. The question is whether anybody believes her anymore or will ever again. If Ann was guilty and they blackmailed her or was going to take her out; she did not have to drag it out two years with hand holding, dinners, these fund raisers, funky web sites and FReePers, etc... I do not know who Ann thinks she is or why she is on our side; however, when they blow their brains out and she looks even more stupid than ever; she will understand why it is just shooting in the air and why her dreams are irrational and unreasonable. She made so many enemies, called her best friend, and trampled all over him also; then cried about it or how sorry she felt. The people behind this did the same god damn thing upstairs; then locked, loaded, and went on attack mode. How inferior can they be and hide? This is clearly a slave breed who cannot make it in America or why.



What all did they do or say to me? 1. It was one stalker after the other popping out. 2. Israel came to me and said she was their agent. 3. The unions upstairs (and Israel) said they represented her. 4. Day after day exchanges with crazed rapist-stalker Hannity about sharing the stage and how they were engaged. 5. Endless stuff on FReeP and the California stampede. 6. Endless harassment from NY and the State Police; a tug of war over Ann. 7. Endless reports of her and Jewish men or mysterious sightings suggesting infidelity. 7. Endless missed opportunity and blockades; emails, web sites, events, etc... endless rumor and pillow talk. 8. Total confusion and chaos in some tug of war and no end in sight. 9. The stress and medical pressures due to attacks on this end, emergencies, lack of opportunity, and being trapped. It was all bottlenecked, a stalemate, and all day long attacks by the unions upstairs and Sean Bin Busted Hannity to decimate his new enemy and new target. The surveillance tripled all day and night; waiting, preying, and trying to get that shot in to do permanent damage. The constant pressure to drive Ann Coulter away or get her in trouble while she said how wrong they were and she did no wrong; endless bickering and fighting. That was just with Ann, read my story and biography.

MASTERPIECE: RELIGION, CRIME, TERRORISM AND THE NEW DECEPTION; DEC 25, 2009

The first part of a new series on totality and economic sustainability. MERRY CHRISTMAS!

Religion, Crime, Terrorism, and the New Deception: http://anncoulterloves.blogspot.com/2009/12/masterpiece-religion-crime-terrorism.html

MIKA WORTH 7 DOLLA; THE VOICE OF BERNIE; PC ATTACK ON CAPITAL IN 1954; SEATTLE-WASHINGTON DC; GOT IT WRONG; ALIEN OR RETARD? COPY CAT MF; BUGGED; 1209

ENGLISH MISSION; NATIONALIST COACH: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0412/17/lkl.01.html
1. champagne witnesses
2. how much in your bank account
3. was there ever any doubt in your mind about attempted murder
4. why did you leave the scene; I almost died that night; you were running from the cops
5. decided to turn myself in; he wanted $5; I had to fast draw; it is a hammer shroud pistol, airlight model
6. what about their demeanor made you feel threatened? I didn't think there would be any trouble...
7. the only person who has a criminal record is me... for carrying a gun; I almost froze to death
8. I don't regret pulling the trigger. I regret -- I should have been more careful with many of the things I said afterwards.
9. What about the four people you shot? Do you ever regret that moment when you opened fire?
10. could have or probably would have beaten the crap out of me. And I would rather shoot all four of them than even have them get a little -- the people should not take crap from other people. Also, I don't think people should give animals crap. And animals shouldn't give people crap. And stuff like that. People shouldn't put up with certain things. I would not get a beating again. I would without any hesitation, shoot a violent criminal again.
11. The policy of revolving door justice changed under Mayor Dinkins
12. I don't look back. There many things in my life that I regret and I wish I had taken a different path on. But that is not one of them.
13. Do you know what became of the guys that you think were robbing you?
14. That's part of my life. That was a long time ago; You know, if you -- the guys who I shot, in some ways, they represented the failures of New York -- of the New York system; They represented the failures of society.
15. I think that would have been the better thing for me, in my life, if I had just given them all my money. Even though they might have pushed me around and beat me up for a second -- that's correct. But I think it was good for New York City. What happened was very good for New York City. Because it forced the city to address crime. What was going to lead to -- if the city was not going to protect the public, which it wasn't, and some of the public was going to protect themselves. Whether this -- whether the city government liked it or not.
16. We had, at the time, the case became very political. Talk radio is always generally fair. Television was fair. But three out of the four New York newspapers took sides against me. They were politically connected. That was prior to the second grand jury. It was that editorial, I feel, is what got me indicted.
17. The judge ruled in the that if I made any more motions to get out of the Bronx, that he was going to hit me with contempt. So we, basically, after we saw the jury, we threw in the towel. And my attorney and I, we were praying that if we got a verdict against us, which we thought -- anything over $5 million we'd be happy with
18. Would you consider this good or bad? It was just what the doctor ordered for New York City. Not for me but for New York City. What do you say to people who would point out you are so kind to animals. Yet, you gunned down four people on the subway? It threw a monkey wrench in everything. I never had the personality that would adjust to being a public figure.
19. Guys came to try to shoot me. I will not say what happened in those incidents; His story, he fought back when he was being robbed and stood up for the rights of others. Did you say on videotape that your intention was to make them suffer as much as possible? And it's fair to say that you were trying to do anything that you could to hurt them, is that right?
_______________________
_______________________
_______________________


NEW ORLEANS POLICE DEPT ARRESTS: Research case... vigilantism, own investigation, or lawlessness?
_______________________
_______________________
_______________________

POLICE v. BAD GUYS WOUND ANALYSIS: NONE

It is much different when the table is turned and reality hits! It is much different when we do not give a damn and he is finally caught. It is much different to criticize when nobody visits him and we write articles and books about it; be careful what he wishes for when blaming us. FACT: if you have never met royals, they probably will not call you or wish to talk to you; it is a fact. Also, royals will not invite you over or seek you out for something; that is why they are royals. FACT: you can call them dickhead, snots, jerks, stingy, so mean, etc... they will probably laugh at you. How many nut cases will go to court and tell the court royals are stalking them and they are the police? How many courts will argue that royals chase and try to talk to labor or liberals? We know someone is lying, but who; it is really complicated and really difficult to detect it or know who is who; it is up for grabs and right down the center anyhow you slice it. FACT: how many royals do you know who is charged with writing threatening letters, assault, a danger to themselves and others; sounds like a torturer, kidnapping, hoax, and a conspiracy. It sounds like a liar and a serial traitor. So if we are royals, why does the authorities think we would be the primary suspect here? Maybe we are dealing with someone who is mentally ill and feels powerful or in control? It is too late to recant the story; the confessions are there; how do you argue it in court when it is before the US attorney's office? A good start is "surprise, you are on candid camera!"

_______________________
_______________________
_______________________

Summary and Analysis: FBI Terrorism Log 1980 to 2004: (Six Year Hiatus before 1993)

Comparison to Middle East Killed-Wounded: Tic-for-Tat

1 to 100: Arab
100 to 5000: Israel

All revenge and retaliation; why no retaliation? Regional and Local; why, what impact? Also, spills left out which result in large claims.
_______________________
FLASH: METALLICA WILL BE IN DC DECEMBER 2010; BUY YOUR TICKETS NOW AT REGULAR PRICE!
FLASH: OASIS AND U2 WILL BE IN CALIFORNIA IN 2011; FIRST COME FIRST SERVE! FLOOR SEATS AVAIL. NOW!