INTRODUCTION TO TORTURE

If you watch the television series “Alias,” you will begin to understand what torture is and how it is used. Torture is used by the enemy and it is used by the forces of good. Torture is used to achieve objectives, goals and any information which can support those objectives and goals. A lot of soldiers who are captured behind enemy lines are subject to torture to extract the mission which puts them so far behind enemy lines. Whether or not you support torture, the issue of torture is difficult to understand because it is based solely on winning. There is no other reason but to win. If you ask soldiers who have been captured and tortured, the fear is other soldiers who may be subject to the same torture. If you ask the person who must win or who gets the information which allows victory, the fear is not having the information. However, the television series “Alias” allows a window into those who have to win and the cost of winning. Winning has painful costs and this is what the television series attempts to be evidence for, the spirit and the story behind the cost of winning.

When you ask for a scientific understanding of torture, you get an ad hoc of humanitarian groups who do not understand the problem fully. The problem is you do not wage war on your brothers in arms. That role is for the enemy. But and however, can you afford to not wage war on an enemy to achieve victory? That is the issue with torture. In a stalemate, it is better to abandon any thought of torture because the enemy will hold that stalemate in a very painful way. The enemy will use the weakness of compassion to give an advantage to their senseless meanness. They will torture your brothers in arms and then turn around and ask if there is a higher order to empathize for those who are tortured. That is called a stalemate and you are at the table of negotiations with an enemy who will inflict pain on your forces to save their own skin. In hostage rescue, that is the most dangerous situation because you are weak on two levels. You are weak to the compassion offered to the enemy and you are weak to the cruelty inflicted on your own forces. Now, the enemy has forced you to the bargaining table to take advantage of the stalemate. Those decisions are left to the highest levels and the most elite hostage rescue forces, they are hardly ever disclosed.

Because the United States of America is typically the location chosen for asylum by forces who loose Civil Wars, the issue of torture does not escape the mind. In seeking asylum, those forces that loose at Civil War go through some of the most horrible conditions, usually inflicted by the enemy. A lot of times, enemy forces go before the highest offices and present their case, to which they know is a lost cause, for attention and media coverage. The left has a hatred for those who wage war on them and a hatred of brothers in arms against them, so they will pick and choose prisoners to sensationalize the capture of soldiers in order to bring hostage rescuers to the bargaining table. They will also go before the media and present a very compelling case about sophistication and an elegance to respect the human rights of anyone. It is like a game of volleyball where one person sets and the other person spikes. The celebration is when they catch the enemy off guard. They will keep doing this until the game is won.

Torture is undefined presently because there are so many causes. One cause says that if the cause is right, does it make torture just as right? The other cause says the opposite, if the cause is wrong or evil, how can torture even be permitted? It is this cat and mouse game with the left again. How can anyone permit their own brothers in arms to be on the receiving end of cruel and manipulative crying by the enemy? They hurt so they hurt back. How do you come to ultimate resolution with your brothers in arms, who you know doesn’t have a care in the world about the enemy, when the enemy uses them to achieve their objectives? This is where the espionage game begins and can get very tricky and the television series “Alias” does a fine job to show both sides of the story.

If you show your weakness, your enemy will exploit it because they know how to get a response and get action. No matter how painful it is or can get, you have to hold your cards and wait for the right opportunity to throw them on the ground in a rage of fury. That is the sweetness and disposition with an enemy who plays a high stakes poker game at the strategic levels. The objective is to use chance and change to widen the margin for victory.

At the strategic level, one wrong decision can widen this margin by a very large proportion because they multiply many times over. The best outcome is to hold your cards, no matter how painful, for as long as you can until the chance arises to throw them down in a fury of rage. Until then you respect the differences of everyone at the bargaining table by acknowledging how their efforts do not go unnoticed. That is what a high stakes poker game at the strategic level feels like. When the moment comes to throw the cards down, the enemy will only stare with a blank nod where they were once very courageous and daringly cocky. You want to know who you are dealing with and whether the people are bold and gutsy enough to accept your terms. If they are not, then they will stare back with a blank nod and disaster will beset them because they know it is too late, nobody can help them out of their own predicament. There is nothing to respect about staring evil down but there is nothing which needs to be reformed when you are forced into this position. That is the nature of evil, people do not enjoy dealing with this problem and it leaves an empty space in life. It robs human beings of what they respect and cherish. It robs them of their own life.

When torture is the subject, the table of negotiations is a process where the most trusted force will be the most winning force. If you have an enemy who remains hidden behind a cause just as evil as the method they deployed, torture, then they will face the work of their own cause in a blank and trusting nod. Whether or not you support torture or not is hard to explain because it is based on winning. Winning comes in many ways and many options. In a stalemate, it is better to abandon any thought of torture because the enemy will hold that stalemate in a very painful way. The enemy will use the weakness of compassion to give an advantage to their senseless meanness and cruel intentions.

In the documentary Modern Marvels called “Torture Devices,” the definition of torture is presented by Michael Nutkiewicz, PhD who is the Executive Director of The Program for Torture Victims.

“Under the UN Convention against torture passed by the General Assembly in 1984, torture is defined as cruel, inhuman or degrading activities against an individual for the purpose of extracting information by-for punishment or revenge or intimidation. A torture instrument is essentially any instrument used to inflict forcible pain on human beings.”

The show then proceeds to explain who and what kind of person tortures another human being in such an aspiring fashion:

“People often imagine a torturer as some psychopath but in fact torturers can be highly educated people who come out of universities with music, art and philosophy degrees and they can also be brutal people who come out of prisons and used by the state to act as torturers.”

Paul Hoffman, chair of the International Executive Committee of Amnesty International, explains the science behind torture:

“Torture is not a proven or effective way, for centuries, to get quality information. Torture gets people to say anything to make the pain go away.”

William I. Atwater, Director of the US Army Ordinance Museum, adds to this science of extracting information and confessions:

“Confessions extracted under torture are notoriously bad. I can get anyone to confess to anything if you give me enough time. I bet I can get you to confess to anything I want you to because people have a breaking point.”

Michael Nutkiewicz, PhD who is the Executive Director of The Program for Torture Victims explains how widespread the use of torture is in today’s modern society”

“Over the last thirty years, torture has risen to prominence as illegal torture devices for a number of governments, military organizations, and police agencies who are trying to hide their torture activities.”

It is not certain who is right and who is wrong when two sides have each other in a stalemate. In stalemate the rule of thumb is to abandon any thought of torture because the consequences of your own brothers in arms cannot be overlooked. The political left is always marching and rioting for social justice and their fair treatment. God forbid if the left were to march and riot in the name of torture or for the sole cause of torturing others. It may be right how torture is used against the political left, but it cannot be excused how it is used in a senseless manner to achieve a stalemate which will become some human shield against a hidden or cruel intention: Hidden and cruel intentions really do not need to employ another method of torture or another peaceful method to achieve a hidden and cruel intent. The question is who really needs to use torture and why. Is torture used to achieve peace or is it used as an instrument of warfare? It is very difficult to reform the nature of warfare when the outcome is always the same.

“It is the kind of pain that causes people to urinate and defecate without control. To loose control of their muscles, it is the kind of pain that causes people to have ongoing mental health problems.”

Paul Hoffman, chair of the International Executive Committee of Amnesty International, explains the science behind torture devices:

“One of the ways torture has often been perpetrated, particularly with political dissidents, has been with the use of electricity… where electrical wires are attached to the genitals or fingers or toes or the person’s head using some generator…”

“The use of these devices (electrical), to terrorize, to punish, to extract information or confession, leaves no visible trace. But the torture instruments of antiquity were not so deceptive.”

“The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) estimates that not only do 400,000 torture victims live in the United States, but between 800 to 1,000 of their torturers do just as well.”

“In the 20^th Century, governments claim the practice is despicable and horrifying, but for at least three millennia, torture was legal. It was a commonly used method of punishment for not only criminals but for innocent slaves and foreigners.”

That is the basis which the documentary scientifically seeks to explain about torture and the use of torture. In the second half of the show Modern Marvels, “Torture Devices”, the documentary highlights the most famous victims of torture. There is a sense of sophistication to those who torture and a sense of victimization to those who receive torture. Cruelty is sometimes a sophisticated mindset of power over others or the ability to inflict pain on subjects who are unruly. If you measure cruelty in terms of power, then the crueler someone is the more powerful they become. Typically, a mindset and fascination with power, cruelty and the ability to inflict pain; is the repertoire and panache of hardened serial killers. It is an innate weakness and the desire to be powerful.

Soldiers are not at liberty to act this out because their discipline demands the elite-ness of their character. If torturers are not soldiers and if they are not fighting for freedom, they are fighting for a dark side of their personality which is manicured from early childhood to an ultimate expression later in life when their life and reality collapses. Vindictive torturers have nothing left to hold onto except their primate desires, primitive intentions and cruel nature. It is not an instrument of warfare but used as an instrument against those who have to engage in warfare. Militaries do not want anything to do with the left or these characters because they ruin their reputations.

There is a certain line that says women, children and elderly people have too much wisdom and innocence to engage in or receive torture. When it comes to the warfare of the ignorant, there are no fine lines to define the machinery of warfare because the most deceptive of enemies will play upon the compassion of the public. If the cruelest of enemies know how to achieve a reaction out of others, they will use that as a machinery of their warfare. In hostage rescue there is no line and there are no definitions because the most vulnerable and the weakest make the most ideal hostages. Strength is not looked upon as an easy target by hostage takers. Success and the ability to escape is a big determining factor for those who both engage in senseless warfare and use torture as an instrument of senseless warfare. Serial killers and those who prey upon the sweetest or weakest parts of the human soul fear the public more than they fear the authorities because they can always escape the authorities but they can never escape the public or the pressure of the public. Who is the public and is it not the public who are the ones who want the blood of their leaders?

The most famous line drawn in the sand when it comes to torture is actually the biblical accounts of the crucifixion of Christ. The documentary on torture depicts the time of Tiberius and the reign of the Romans.

“Crucifixion as a form of public execution predates the Romans. We know at least as early as the Persian Empire some kind of public display of death that involves hanging of victims. The idea seems rather straight forward; make a person’s death as publicly horrific as possible. The purpose of this was to send a powerful message to would be dissidents and trouble makers; do not defy the State’s authority.”

“In 1864, The Geneva Convention was drafted. It was an international agreement that among other things prohibited the use of torture. But rather than bringing the practice to an end, it would slowly drive it underground.”

__________

The Man Who Ordered CIA's Tape Destruction

Jose Rodriguez Ordered Tapes Of Terror Interrogations Destroyed Without Telling CIA Director

WASHINGTON, Dec. 10, 2007

Jose Rodriguez

The biggest overhaul of the U.S. intelligence community in half a century.

(CBS) He is the man who ordered the destruction of video tapes documenting the CIA’s interrogation of two high-level al Qaeda operatives.

The then-head of the clandestine service, Jose Rodriguez, ordered the tapes destroyed shortly after a Washington Post expose focused attention on the CIA’s secret prisons, CBS News national security correspondent David Martin reports.

“Well, I think there might have been concern that those tapes could have been called for by some outside body and the CIA would no longer maintain control over them,” said retired CIA officer John Brennan, who is now a CBS News consultant.

Brennan says Rodriguez was also worried the Justice Department was backing away from its earlier support of harsh interrogation techniques, such as waterboarding.

“And that therefore agency officers who participated in those interrogation sessions may be subject to some type of prosecution,” Brennan said.

Rodriguez ordered the tapes destroyed without telling then-CIA director Porter Goss and against the advice of the CIA’s own general counsel, the White House deputy counsel and the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee.

“I expressed concern about destroying any video tapes and said that would be a very ill-advised move by the agency,” Rep. Jane Harman, the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said.

Former CIA officer John Kiriakou led the raid, which captured the al Qaeda operative Abu Zubaydah, told CBS News he and at least one other CIA officer refused to use the harsh interrogation techniques.

That job, he said, was turned over to retired commandos under contract to the CIA.

© MMVII, CBS Interactive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.[1]

__________

Senate Panel to Question Hayden on CIA Videotapes[2]

By Tom Gjelten

Morning Edition, December 10, 2007 · CIA Director Michael Hayden is scheduled to appear before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday to discuss why his agency videotaped the interrogation of terrorism suspects and then destroyed the tapes.

The Justice Department and the CIA say they will investigate the destruction of the tapes, which are believed to have shown interrogators using especially harsh methods.

Just a week ago, the CIA and other agencies released a national intelligence estimate that concluded Iran halted its nuclear weapons program four years ago. Because it challenged the Bush administration's claims, the estimate was taken as a demonstration of the spy agency's independence.

Praise for NIE

Democrat Jay Rockefeller, the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee and a longtime CIA critic, praised the estimate as an example of sound analysis.

But the CIA did not bask in glory for long. On Thursday came the news that the agency videotaped interrogations of terrorism suspects and then destroyed the tapes — despite warnings from Congress not to do so. The tape story quickly overshadowed the Iran story: It combined in one scandal two big issues —- the CIA's interrogation policies and CIA accountability.

The news of the tapes broke just as Congress was advancing legislation that would bar the agency from using extreme procedures to force detainees to talk — such as waterboarding, which simulates drowning.

Tom Malinowski, Washington advocacy director for Human Rights Watch, said the CIA may have stopped videotaping interrogations just a few months after it started because the agency realized the images might be inflammatory.

"Certainly one possibility is that they stopped because they began to realize that what was on those videotapes was potentially dynamite, that if people in the future could see the visual images of prisoners being waterboarded they would be horrified even more than if they read the description of that technique in the newspaper," Malinowski said.

The CIA's congressional overseers meanwhile seized on another point — that the agency apparently destroyed the videotapes on its own. Three days after praising the work of the CIA, Rockefeller was outraged.

"They destroyed it without letting us know, without asking our permission, without consulting, without informing us in any way. They just did what the CIA likes to do," Rockefeller said.

The charge that the CIA sometimes does whatever it wants is an old one.

In 1975, Democratic Sen. Frank Church of Idaho led a congressional inquiry into CIA secret actions, charging that the agency sometimes acted "like a rogue elephant."

Loch Johnson, Church's staff director, said Church wanted to make the intelligence agencies a part of the U.S. government that would not be exempt from a system of checks and balances.

History of CIA Oversight

As an outgrowth of the Church committee proceedings, the House and Senate intelligence committees were given oversight of the nation's intelligence agencies.

Johnson, who is now a professor at the University of Georgia, has been monitoring CIA oversight ever since his days on the Hill.

He said the agency's apparently unilateral decision to destroy the videotapes raises the question of whether the agency has fulfilled its obligation to keep Congress informed of its actions.

"Starting in 1975, we had a whole new era of serious oversight when it came to intelligence, and this flies in the face of that whole effort," Johnson said.

Hayden, the current CIA director, was not at the agency at the time the interrogation videotapes were made, nor was he there when they were destroyed. He has said repeatedly he is a firm advocate of congressional oversight.

When Hayden appears on Capitol Hill, he will undoubtedly face tough questions on that point, as well as on the interrogation practices that gave rise to this new scandal.

Nation

Timeline: CIA and Interrogation Videotapes

__________

By Eric Weiner[3]

NPR.org, December 7, 2007 · News that the CIA made and then destroyed videotapes of al-Qaida suspects undergoing harsh interrogations while in agency custody seemed to have come out of nowhere. However, the story has been unfolding for years, though largely out of public view. The controversy over the tapes spans several countries and involves Congress, federal prosecutors and the top leadership of the CIA.

Here are some of the key moments.

March 2002: Terrorism suspect Abu Zubaydah, allegedly a high-ranking member of al-Qaida, is captured in Pakistan and flown to an undisclosed CIA detention center. Zubaydah is said to be an organizer of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and a top al-Qaida recruiter. The Bush administration portrays his capture as a major breakthrough.

2002: Abu Zubaydah and at least one other al-Qaida member are subjected to harsh interrogation techniques, possibly including waterboarding (controlled drowning), by their CIA captors. The agency videotapes several of these interrogations, partly to ensure that the techniques used are legal and partly to provide backup documentation of the information collected, according to CIA officials.

2003: The CIA's internal watchdog watches the videotapes and verifies that the interrogation practices were legal, according to CIA director Michael Hayden.

Also in 2003, the CIA informs Rep. Jane Harman (D-Calif.) and two other members of Congress of the tapes' existence.

August 2004: The 9/11 Commission completes its work on the terror attacks and the U.S. government's response to it. The commission had requested all relevant information from the CIA. But it never received videotapes of CIA interrogations conducted in 2002. An agency spokesman says the CIA "went to great lengths to meet the requests of the 9/11 Commission" and preserved the tapes in case the commission asked for them specifically.

2005: Lawyers representing terrorism suspect Zacharias Moussaoui make formal requests to the CIA for transcripts and other documentary evidence of the interrogation of agency prisoners. CIA lawyers tell prosecutors that the agency did not have such recordings.

Later in 2005, the CIA destroys at least two videotapes documenting the interrogation of two al-Qaida suspects in the agency's custody. The tapes showed CIA employees subjecting the suspects to harsh interrogation techniques. The tapes were reportedly destroyed at the request of Jose Rodriguez, then head of the agency's Directorate of Operations, its clandestine service.

November 2006: The Senate Intelligence Committee learns of the tapes' destruction, according to committee chairman Jay Rockefeller (D-WV).

December 2007: CIA Director Michael Hayden tells agency employees that the CIA destroyed videotapes it made in 2002 of two top terrorism suspects because it was afraid that keeping them "posed a security risk." If the tapes had become public, they would have exposed CIA officials "and their families to retaliation from al-Qaida and its sympathizers." Hayden makes the announcement hours after The New York Times informs the agency of its intention to publish a report about the tapes. Human rights groups and some members of Congress express outrage, accusing the agency of "destroying evidence." The Senate's second-ranking Democrat, Richard Durbin of Illinois, asks the Justice Department to investigate whether the CIA obstructed justice by destroying the videotapes.

“Seven Nation Army” lyrics by The White Stripes

I'm gonna fight 'em all

A seven nation army couldn't hold me back

They're gonna rip it off

Taking their time right behind my back

And I'm talking to myself at night

Because I can't forget

Back and forth through my mind

Behind a cigarette

And the message coming from my eyes

Says leave it alone

Don't want to hear about it

Every single one's got a story to tell

Everyone knows about it

From the Queen of England to the hounds of hell

And if I catch it coming back my way

I'm gonna serve it to you

And that aint what you want to hear

But that’s what I'll do

And the feeling coming from my bones

Says find a home

I'm going to Wichita

Far from this opera for evermore

I'm gonna work the straw

Make the sweat drip out of every pore

And I'm bleeding, and I'm bleeding, and I'm bleeding

Right before the lord

All the words are gonna bleed from me

And I will sing no more

And the stains coming from my blood

Tell me go back home

"Brothers in Arms" lyrics by Dire Straits

Through these mist covered mountains

Are homes now for me?

But my home is the lowlands

And always will be

Some day you’ll return to

Your valleys and your farms

And you’ll no longer burn

To be brothers in arms

Through these fields of destruction

Baptisms of fire

I’ve witnessed your suffering

As the battles raged higher

And though they did hurt me so bad

In the fear and alarm

You did not desert me

My brothers in arms

There’s so many different worlds

So many different suns

And we have just one world

But we live in different ones

Now the suns gone to hell

And the moons riding high

Let me bid you farewell

Every man has to die

But it’s written in the starlight

And every line on your palm

We’re fools to make war

On our brothers in arms

“Unwell” lyrics by Matchbox 20

All day…
Staring at the ceiling
Making friends with shadows on my wall
all night…
Hearing voices telling me
that I should get some sleep
because tomorrow might be good for something
Hold on…
I'm feeling like I'm headed for a
Breakdown…
I don't know why

(Chorus)
I'm not crazy I'm just a little unwell
I know right now you can't tell
But stay awhile and maybe then you'll see
A different side of me
I'm not crazy I'm just a little impaired
I know right now you don't care
But soon enough you're gonna think of me
And how I used to be
Me…

Talking to myself in public
Dodging glances on the train
I know…
I know they've all been talking 'bout me
I can hear them whisper
and it makes me think there must be something wrong
with me…
Out of all the hours thinking
somehow
I've lost my mind

(Chorus)

I been talking in my sleep
pretty soon they'll come to get me
Yeah they’re taking me away

(Chorus)
Hey how I used to be…
How I used to be yeah…
Well I'm just a little unwell…
How I used to be…
How I used to be…

"Rocks You Like a Hurri-cane" lyrics by The Scorpions

Its early morning

The sun comes out

Last night was shaking

And pretty loud

My cat is purring

And scratches my skin

So what is wrong?

With another sin

The bitch is hungry

She needs to tell

So give her inches

And feed her well

More days to come

New places to go

I’ve got to leave

It’s time for a show

(Chorus)

Here I am, rocks you like a hurri-cane

Here I am, rocks you like a hurri-cane

My body is burning

It starts to shout

Desire is coming

It breaks out loud

Lust is in cages

Till storm breaks loose

Just have to make it

With someone I choose

The night is calling

I have to go

The wolf is hungry

He runs the show

He’s licking his lips

He’s ready to win

On the hunt tonight

For love at first sting

(Chorus)

(Chorus)

Rocked you like a hurri-cane

Its early morning

The sun comes out

Last night was shaking

And really loud

My cat is purring

It scratched my skin

So what is wrong?

With another sin

The night is calling

I have to go

The wolf is hungry

He runs the show

He’s licking his lips

He’s ready to win

On the hunt tonight

For love at first sting

(Chorus)

(Chorus)

Here I am

“All The Things That I Have Done” lyrics by The Killers

When there's nowhere else to run

Is there room for one more sun?

One more sun

If you can hold on

If you can hold on, hold on

I wanna stand up, I wanna let go

You know, you know - no you don't, you don't

I wanna shine on, in the hearts of men

I want a meaning from the back of my broken hand

Another headache, another heart breaks

I'm so much older than I can take

And my affection, well it comes and goes

I need direction to perfection, no no no no

Help me out - Yeah

You know you gotta help me out - Yeah

Oh, don't you put me on the back burner

You know you gotta help me out - Yeah

And when there's nowhere else to run

Is there room for one more sun?

These changes ain't changing me

The cold-hearted boy I used to be

Yeah

You know you gotta help me out - Yeah

Oh don't you put me on the back burner

You know you gotta help me out - Yeah

You're gonna bring yourself down - Yeah

You're gonna bring yourself down - Yeah

You're gonna bring yourself down

I got soul, but I'm not a soldier

I got soul, but I'm not a soldier

I got soul, but I'm not a soldier

I got soul, but I'm not a soldier

I got soul, but I'm not a soldier

I got soul, but I'm not a soldier

I got soul, but I'm not a soldier

I got soul, but I'm not a soldier

I got soul, but I'm not a soldier

I got soul, but I'm not a soldier

Yeah

You know you gotta help me out - Yeah

Oh don't you put me on the back burner

You know you gotta help me out - Yeah

You're gonna bring yourself down - Yeah

You're gonna bring yourself down - Yeah

Oh don't you put me on the back burner

You're gonna bring yourself down - Yeah

You're gonna bring yourself down

Over and in, last call for sin

While everyone's lost, the battle is won

With all these things that I've done

All these things that I've done

If you can hold on

If you can hold on

“Headstrong” lyrics by Trapt

Circling, circling

Circling your head

contemplating everything you ever said
Now I see the, truth I got a doubt
A different motive in your eyes, and now I'm out
See you later
I see your fantasy, you want to make a reality paved in gold
See inside, inside of our heads
Well that's over
I see your motives inside, and decision to hide

[Chorus]
Back off we'll take you on
Headstrong to take on anyone
I know that you are wrong
Headstrong we're Headstrong
Back off We'll take you on
Headstrong to take on anyone
I know that you are wrong and
This is not where you belong

I can't give anything away
I won't give everything away

Conclusions manifest

your first impressions got to be your very best
I see you're full, of sh** and that's alright
That's how you play I guess you get through every night
Now that's over
I see your fantasy, you want to make it a reality paved in gold
See inside, inside of our heads
Well that's all over
I see your motives inside, and decision to hide

[Chorus]
I can't give anything away
I won't give everything away

(Repeat)

I know, I know all about
I know, I know all about
I know, I know all about
I know, I know all about your motives inside and decision to hide
[Chorus]

Where you belong

This is not where you belong
I won't give everything away
I can't give anything away

This is not where you belong

“Lost in the Crowd” lyrics by Shinedown

Should I offer up my hand
And save a wish for once
For all of us
And should I offer up my hand
And lay the guilt on myself
So it's easier , to not stay, to not stay

(Chorus)
Because I found you in your corner
I pulled you out of the clouds
You left in such a hurry
Your face got lost in the crowd

Should I open up my eye's or just ignore who you are
And what you could have been
And should I open up my eye's and make believe you will change
So it's easier to not stay, to not stay

(Chorus)

"Nonstop to Nowhere" by Faster Pussycat

Well its 5 o'clock in the morning

And I-aight can't fall asleep, again

Times are changing and moving fast and way too fast for me

Seems like only yesterday I was skipping school and stealing gasoline

I've been talking I guess you call it talking a, white lie

One minute I'm on top of the world

And the next thing you know…

(Chorus)

I'm on the lame train

I got a first-class ticket on the nonstop to nowhere

(To know where)

Where it takes me I don't know

(I’m starting to know where)

I guess the tracks you make

(On your own)

I'm on the lame train

I got a first-class ticket on the nonstop to nowhere

(To know where)

Where it takes me I don't know

(I’m starting to know where)

Sometimes I

Just sit and daydream

And I-aight-aight just slips away, from here

If only I had a crystal ball or could invent a time machine

I'd go into the future take a good look around

And see what life has in store for me

I've been walking I guess you call it walking a, thin line

One minute I'm on top of the world and the next thing you know…

I'm on the lame train

I got a first-class ticket on the nonstop to nowhere

(To know where)

Where it takes me I don't know

(I’m starting to know where)

I guess the tracks you make

(On your own)

It's like a chain gang

(It’s a shame game and I know the exit)

But my problems seem to follow me

(To know where)

And I know

(It seems to follow me)

Nonstop to know where

(Solo)

I'm on the lame train

I got a first-class ticket on the nonstop to nowhere

Where it takes me I don't know

I guess the tracks you make

On your own.

Now I’m on the lame train

I got the first class ticket on the nonstop to nowhere

(To know where)

It’s all caught written in stone

(Nonstop to nowhere)

I guess the tracks you make

On your own

(Chorus)

---

[1] The source for this article is the CBS Evening News with Katie Couric.

[2] The source of this newswire is National Public Radio show “Morning Edition.”

[3] Second part of report from National Public Radio.

THE PROBLEM WITH TERRORISM AND THE PROBLEM WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT

This book has made an effort to outline a problem with terrorism in this world. It has also made an attempt to explain why there is an equal problem with law enforcement in this world. Law enforcement is not a military. Law enforcement deals with very small minded problems such as spousal abuse, robbery, traffic infractions, etc… it is not equipped, trained or educated to cope with the war on terrorism. Similarly, law enforcement does not understand terrorists and have a “weak on terrorism” attitude which sometimes prevents the military from performing their duties. We are not saying law enforcement is fighting on the wrong side, we are simply saying they put a face on the problem when they take up sides with terrorists because it is a military problem. Generals and the highest levels of security forces deal with terrorists and they understand this threat. Therefore, the “weak on crime” mindset takes on a laissez-faire “weak on terrorist” view where law enforcement do not want to go after them but work with them. This chapter will discuss why and what our conclusions are.

As hostage rescuers, we make an effort to talk to hostage takers or any threat on this earth. We do not sneak up on them and hog tie them so that they disappear off the face of the earth. Terrorists do this. Terrorists do this because they make no effort to understand the world they live in our situation. Terrorists make no effort to understand why they took a hostage, why it is wrong, why it is shameless and will end up hurting their cause or fatally causing their demise. Terrorists have many flaws to their personality and their intelligence which sometimes causes the relationships with others difficult. Their lack of personality and lack of intelligence prevents them from having a good relationship with others and this causes them to become angry and enraged to the point where they want to strike out at what they feel is the cause. Sometimes they may have a legitimate complaint; however, more often than not, the fact they would take a hostage or hold others hostage is a serious sign of a blackened soul. That blackened soul has no respect for others and has no respect for differences between people. There is a reason why they invade the lives of others and this reason is the lack of respect for others which is severely complicated by a blackened soul. It is about hate and greed which the left magnifies on a level never seen before while they insist others are trying to run them over and how it is a right wing conspiracy.

There have been many examples of the sheer evilness of the political left and their constant attempt to knock on the door of the cyber and satellite warfare program and telling it the left is the boss of the program. It is true they have a talent which they make quite a successful living at by invading the lives of others, controlling it and ordering others around. They were able to shut down the life of the father of cyber and satellite warfare for over a decade and destroying any semblance of economic vitality. Part of the problem was to figure out if anyone would come to the aid. If nobody did, then it would mean the chance of success would be greater. This decade of being a hostage was an attempt to write a script and to form an image for the father of cyber and satellite warfare.

This image was a difficult, obnoxious, reckless liberal bum who was down and out and who needed the political left because the world was under attack by right wing conspiracies, racists under every bed and the political left was a heart of gold who was there to help and to protect the father of cyber and satellite warfare. The father of cyber and satellite warfare was made to feel special by the left? Then the left was special and had a heart of gold, so naturally this was a hate crime? In order to produce this image they had to “do brain surgery” and injure both the physical body and the mind. They want to hire a difficult, obnoxious, reckless leftist who is going to go around and do whatever they say; we do not dispute how they wanted to hire us and wanted to work closely. The dispute is what transpired and how the effort was carried out. In order to do this, they had to figure out a way to make the ideology of the political left fertile. How do you make the ground fertile for labor union policy, mob and gangster association, socialism and communist ideology, an utter mess and absolute imperfection in the world and leftist political ideology? The political left is trying to manufacture equality and rights without any regard for quality or intelligence. The only way is to capture someone and injure them or “cut” them until the scars grow to suit the political left; and this is the story of what the political left tried; but they also stated while this book is being written “he is too powerful.” It is too private to say how successful they were because they are invisible wounds.

In other words, there was a point while this book was being written when they figured out something was going on which they did not know or were aware of. In order to fulfill the mission and to not let this fall into the wrong hands, we had to hide, we had to sneak around, we had to suffer, and we had to keep things hidden. In order to tell the story, a lot of information was hidden from them, yet they still insisted they were too powerful to fight and they still insisted after everything which happened “he is not a good fit why do we even bother with the little brat.” That will show the arrogance and the narcissism of the political left, they feel they have something special going on and they feel this decade of being a hostage was a privilege where they took a person who was not a good fit, tried to justify or make the pieces fit, and kept on insisting how this was such a special moment to have them in our lives. This is without question a very disturbed and a totally warped mind of a psychotic person who has a complete inferiority complex with the truth almost like a serial killer. They wanted to hire the biggest idiot who had more life problems than the world has ever seen; yet had a perfect resume, military training as the best soldiers, who was off his rocker, suffered massive abuse from mean people, who enjoyed minorities and multiculturalism, who enjoyed obese and grotesque females who had a similar personality, who got them jobs and opportunity, who hated the military, who would accept benevolence and oppression, and who would fight to the end to protect the political left following and get them high jobs. We are just protesting their efforts while we wait to bring them to justice.

In order to coexist with this psychotic mess of a beast, control was a big issue. First, they made clear how “we are on the same side” and we encourage this type of behavior. At the time we had no idea what was happening or who “we” were, it was an extremely irritating low class and small minded faceless enemy who was extremely upset at the world. Therefore, they must expose the hostage to situations which will bring out his worst while we pat his back and stand beside him. We went through these scenarios kicking and screaming for months on end, even years on end until we simply could not take it anymore. The human body simply shuts down in an almost vegetative state. They set a goal and kept to the formula until they achieved that goal of sameness and equality.

Another example of the callous disregard for others was the constant attempts to play cupid. Pretty girls were chased off or intimidated. The worst candidates would make themselves look slightly not, while they walked and displayed themselves like some meat market. These girls are nobody near the standards of the other and nowhere near equal sameness. However, underneath that mate is control. The political left was playing cupid in order to control the father of cyber and satellite warfare. They wanted to make the biggest monster and set him loose in society. To do this, you had to take someone who is meticulous and perfect; then injure them until they became the most difficult, outspoken, obnoxious, reckless leftist who is going to go around and do whatever they tell him to or else be fired and removed. This is why there are so many injuries and why this story is so disturbing. They may say “we just wanted to hire him and offer him a job” but that is not the whole story, they wanted to make you live out what the job duties entailed. They do not ask and do not accept no for an answer because the political left is completely arrogant and narcissistic; you are simply their hostage and prisoner. They make sure to show you they are too powerful and it is not in your best interest to fight back. They also call it freedom to be whoever you want to be, an utter mess of a life. They try to make a hostage not embarrassed and shameless.

This cupid game was a game of control and a handler which would not give up on us. Hence, this situation of trying and successfully ruining the financial health and credit standing; then relying on their network of spouses, employers, businesses and the like. It is very similar to a cult group who writes daily horoscopes which they make up to cater to the political left. This is why the life of the father of cyber and satellite warfare is an utter wreck and why it shut down in an almost vegetative state. They wanted to force an “approved” mate who will carry their torch for freedom but had the life of the political left. Who in their right state of mind and who is insane enough to volunteer for this? It was not and nowhere near a volunteer situation, it was a hostage and kidnapping situation where an individual is broken down slowly by bleeding them quickly first then slowly if no results were made. The goal is to produce sensitivity for the leftist cause in America and to have a big heart for lives of wrecked individuals, a state of utter brokenness and vegetation. The financial situation naturally put many blocks on business, career, personal and love opportunities. The injuries were to warp the mind and trick or induce a mental breakdown and a vegetative state where “the dog won’t hunt no more.” Playing cupid gave the left a powerful measure of control and daily intelligence on the progress. It also rejuvenated the injuries they caused because they were willing to fix what they did; but as everybody can see, it meant giving up all your dreams in life. The political left would then take over the cyber and satellite warfare program, load it with their people and fulfill some goal for quality jobs by a wreck. The only lifelines would be followers of the left who would throw a floatation device on a life sinking very fast. The idea is, you are sinking fast and we are offering a hand, if you do not take it, you will drown because we have a big heart and we will not give up on you. They want a medal for their cause and efforts.

The cupid game was the biggest level of control they could possibly do and this was avoided as if it were a religion which brought on serious depression, isolation and loneliness. You can kick and scream; fight like hell was unleashed and they will never accept “no” for an answer or give up. They simply will not stop or accept no for an answer and throw it back in your face or shove it down your throat because they feel they have a big heart and have something really special going on. The game of cupid was to force you to accept a mate you would never want while it offered them total control over finances and credit which they had totally wrecked. Then they blamed it on a right wing conspiracy of racist and mean people who were disillusioned and trying to kill you. This was not voluntary undercover work and nobody in their right mind would ever volunteer for this because it is absolutely insane and excruciating pain. Even the best soldiers in the world became vegetative and when this feeling begins to settle in, you reach down and begin to figure out a way out. This brings us to Lori and the girl who came into the picture. We were trying everything possible without disclosing any information to escape the situation. The game now was more difficult and even severely injured, tattered and still under attack; it more escape and evasion with a new fresh body sent to help.

When this was pushed to its limits and things had to surface, the father of cyber and satellite warfare came out from hiding and notified just about everyone including the authorities with specific instructions to contact high offices and tell them what happened. This is not only an emergency, it is a terrorist attack on the nation by maniacs who do not panic hearing this. It is like a normal business day to these people. To this day, we do not know what happened; all we know is we were arrested in the middle of the night by federal authorities with machine guns and Lori, the fresh body who was doing a fine job caring for us, is completely out of the picture. Now we are in prison for three years in a comma state, drugged up twenty four hours a day with some of the most high tech psychoactive drugs. Did this game end there or did it go further? It went further because now we were given a court order which said we were delusional, had no chance to take this to court, and was forced to accept the situation or remain in prison while it was adjudicated. To this day it is not adjudicated and to this day nothing has changed. Every time an effort is made to either bring this to court or challenge this matter in a court of law, the metal doors come down and it is blocked in every single direction as if there is some “breakout” or some serious security breach.

Add on top of what has already transpired more and more assaults during the month of June 2006, a violent home invasion on June 19, 2006, an arrest on June 19, 2006 for having fought back. Then add thirty days in Niagara County Jail which was the point of crossing the Canadian border to write this book and have a new life, five thousand dollars bail, eleven months to figure out nothing illegal occurred and the fact how the people who committed this atrocity was the Niagara Falls Police and have yet to step a foot in court. Even this second home invasion and this second imprisonment were legally blocked in all direction and a threat was made for “contempt of court” if any effort was made to challenge it further. So we want some answers and feel the people of the world deserve some answers; why are these people who committed all of the above not in jail and what are they doing on this side of the borders? This is a manipulative creature who exploits hatred to the maximum to further the leftist cause. When you read this you will know why we are the best soldiers in the world because you will know how you would have reacted under the same situations, you have the same cards to play with.

This book has tried to identify an existing problem with terrorists in the world. The political left is a terrorist and criminal organization. Now we will focus the attention to law enforcement. What is the problem with law enforcement and why is there so many abrasions and abrasive reasons to conclude they are a problem?

Rewards and punishments is the first reason. Law enforcement goes into this profession thinking it will bring guidance to their life. Soldiers are taught young that fame and glory cannot be found in warfare and they must not seek it if they wish to have some permanence in their life. It is just like any other profession people go into; however, it is not. There is tragedy and tragedy has no regard for any human creature. The same applies with nature, if you wish to battle nature, then you must understand how nature has no compassion. Thomas Hobbes even described nature when he said how life was cruel, brutal and short. Additionally, there is also exposure to the worst individuals in society. This will produce the blackened soul to those who are misguided. That blackened soul will deteriorate until it will begin to go after and attack whoever and whatever steps in their way. The psychological stress may cause some to become abusive and feel the need to become a teacher who “teaches a lesson” to criminal elements. Therefore, the psychological effects can be very negative and can create a very unhealthy paranoia.

The second problem with law enforcement is politics. Law enforcement is a life line. They are not the best soldiers in the eyes of the military because they do not make any effort to understand the threats in this world or go up against them. Therefore, the political problems begin to accustom itself to crime and are influenced by cultural pressure. Law enforcement begins to sympathize and forms a “weak on crime attitude.” That same weak on crime attitude will overlap the war on terrorism. Therefore, the war on terrorism is befuddled with a law enforcement solution and a military solution. Law enforcement is accustomed to reform or imprison terrorists in order to reform them. Military forces are accustomed to use equal or proportional force to combat terrorism. Therefore, you have a wide gap in views.

We know and we are aware how terrorists are constantly knocking on our borders, testing us and our weaknesses in order to plan the next attack. We try to walk lightly when egg shells are breaking; however, the espionage game of probing and baiting is sometimes obvious. The terrorist movement when it exceeds the one and two dimensional levels becomes cunning and manipulative. The level of deception is severe and ruthless. Therefore, a typical terrorist movement will invoke crisis and chaos while flooding personnel to security and military positions. The goal is to acquire a footing and maybe one or two target acquisitions. We have ten years of experience in this game when it was tried on us. Invisible and deceptive, the terrorist will plot and break into offices, rummage through personal belongings and take you hostage. Then the arrogance kicks in where they ramble and vent while they make a quick exit for the door trying not to get shot in the back. Terrorists are so arrogant they feel they can make a clean getaway or think hostage rescuers will not shoot them in the back. Our job is to free hostages, not listen to a ramble of lies which were made up by reading the daily horoscope.

You see, there are things in this world which cannot be replaced or fixed. Those things are sacred. When you desecrate it or when you disfigure those sacred things, it disturbs the soul on a level which causes the universe to collapse. You can spend the remainder of your life working to fix that sacredness but you will never understand it cannot be fixed or replaced. There are some people in this world that will never stop and they have no respect for others or their differences when it leads them down a journey of death and destruction. There are things in this world that are so sacred; we cannot even talk about it. Keep in mind, both the father or the cyber and satellite warfare program and the program itself got dragged by their hair down a road which was sacred and now we are stuck in a position which can never be fixed or replaced again. So we simply ask the terrorists in this world to lay down their arms and to turn them in while being accountable for their actions. If not, we have no choice, none whatsoever, except to go after them which will take decades if not another century to fix. “They are too powerful” and “they are real good” is not the right answer.

The third problem with law enforcement on the war on terrorism is accountability. When the political culture lacks accountability and responsible actions; law enforcement feels helpless to the community. It is not the role of law enforcement to battle the community and they begin to make statements such as “lets work together to figure out a solution.” Military forces do not “work together” with dangerous terrorists. They exist in isolation and are used only when the proper reasons are necessary. It is not meant to be abused at the same time it is not meant to be used for every problem in this world, only the most severe.

The fourth problem is cooperation. The system which law enforcement exists in encourages them to not cooperate where the military is highly disciplined and they respect the leadership command. The military is not a local militia group based on the “Posse Comitatus ” clause in the Constitution. The Posse Comitatus law empowers local communities to form local militias through implied powers. Therefore, the creation of the police is vague as a Constitutional law. Therefore, you have both a leadership problem and a lack of cooperative spirit because it is a turf war of bosses and leaders. When you have these turf wars and the wrong individuals who embody the blackened soul, they tend to abuse their arrest powers. Arrest powers turn into a form of harassment and it is used to block or deny threats. Therefore, these local militias use their arrest powers then justify try to justify them. An example of this is to spend three hundred dollars inappropriately, then justify it by requesting more. Therefore, arrest powers become a justified way to arrest who is disliked or cannot be controlled. This Posse Comitatus clause added layer upon layer of law enforcement and jurisdictions.

Before we go on, let’s outline the basic grounds of the Posse Comitatus clause in the US Constitution. The Posse Comitatus clause will be the premise of local militias and also terrorism. If you read any college level course on what terrorism is, it will say “one mans terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter.” Rhetoric aside, hostage rescuers do not see it this way and they do not like the degree of dishonesty which terrorist use to describe themselves as freedom fighters or even revolutionary liberators. Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia has a sufficient description of this problem, here are the excerpts.

• The Posse Comitatus Act is a United States federal law (18 U.S.C. § 1385) passed on June 16, 1878 after the end of Reconstruction. The Act was intended to prohibit Federal troops from supervising elections in former Confederate states. It generally prohibits Federal military personnel and units of the United States National Guard under Federal authority from acting in a law enforcement capacity within the United States, except where expressly authorized by the Constitution or Congress. The Posse Comitatus Act and the Insurrection Act substantially limit the powers of the Federal government to use the military for law enforcement.

• The original act referred only to the United States Army. The Air Force was added in 1956, and the Navy and the Marine Corps have been included by a regulation of the Department of Defense. The United States Coast Guard is not included in the act as it has federal law enforcement duties as part of its primary mission. This law is often mentioned when it appears that the Department of Defense is interfering in domestic disturbances.

• In 1971, Deputy Secretary of Defense David Packard wrote the Packard Memo or Employment of Military Resources in the Event of Civil Disturbances which modified the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 32, Volume 2, Chapter 1, Part 215, and Section 6. This addition revoked a substantial part of the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act providing for 'exceptions' to the Act "to prevent loss of life or wanton destruction of property and to restore governmental functioning and public order when sudden and unexpected civil disturbances, disasters, or calamities seriously endanger life and property and disrupt normal governmental functions to such an extent that duly constituted local authorities are unable to control the situation" and "to protect Federal government functions when the need for protection exists". "Packard's directive (stated) that turning over law enforcement will 'normally' require a Presidential Executive Order, but that this requirement can be waived in 'cases of sudden and unexpected emergencies... which require that immediate military action be taken." (Lindorff, 1988) Packard's directive, in essence, reinstated the possibility of martial law in the United States, prohibited since 1878. "Martial law was defined in an integral Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) memo written in 1982... The memo, written by FEMA official John Brinkerhoff to agency director Louis Giuffrida, notes that martial law “suspends all prior existing laws, functions, systems, and programs of civil government, replacing them... with a military system.” (Lindorff, 1988).
• There are a number of situations in which the Act does not apply. These include:

1. National Guard units while under the authority of the governor of a state;

2. Troops when used pursuant to the Federal authority to quell domestic violence as was the case during the 1992 Los Angeles riots;

3. Troops used under the order of the President of the United States pursuant to the Insurrection Act

4. Under 18 U.S.C. § 831, the Attorney General may request that the Secretary of Defense provide emergency assistance if civilian law enforcement is inadequate to address certain types of threat involving the release of nuclear materials, such as potential use of a Nuclear or Radiological weapon. Such assistance may be by any personnel under the authority of the Department of Defense, provided such assistance does not adversely affect U.S. military preparedness.

• Homeland Security:

TITLE 6 CHAPTER 1 SUBCHAPTER VIII Part H Sec. 466. Congress finds the following:

1. Section 1385 of title 18 (commonly known as the Posse Comitatus Act) prohibits the use of the Armed Forces as a Posse Comitatus to execute the laws except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress.

2. Enacted in 1878, the Posse Comitatus Act was expressly intended to prevent United States Marshals, on their own initiative, from calling on the Army for assistance in enforcing Federal law.

3. Some believe the Posse Comitatus Act has served the Nation well in limiting the use of the Armed Forces to enforce the law. Whether this is a good thing or not is subject to debate.

4. The Posse Comitatus Act was not intended to be a complete barrier to the use of the Armed Forces for a range of domestic purposes, including law enforcement functions, when the use of the Armed Forces is authorized by Act of Congress or the President determines that the use of the Armed Forces is required to fulfill the President's obligations under the Constitution provide for the common defense or to respond promptly to insurrection, or other serious emergency.

5. Existing laws, including Title 10, Chapter 15 (commonly known as The Insurrection Act), and The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Title 42, Chapter 68), grant the President broad powers that may be invoked in the event of domestic emergencies, including an attack against the Nation using weapons of mass destruction, and these laws specifically authorize the President to use the Armed Forces to help restore public order.

6. The Posse Comitatus Act could be replaced, nullified or modified by a simple act of Congress.

In early 2006, the 109th Congress passed a controversial bill which grants the President the right to commandeer federal or state National Guard Troops and use them inside the United States. This bill, entitled the John Warner Defense Appropriation Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (H.R. 5122.ENR), contains a provision, (Section 1076) which allows the President to:

“...employ the armed forces, including the National Guard in Federal service, to... restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition in any State or possession of the United States..., where the President determines that,...domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of maintaining public order; suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy...”

Senator Patrick Leahy and others have condemned Section 1076 because it effectively nullifies the Posse Comitatus Act and the Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C. 331-335) and gives the President the legal ability to define under what conditions martial law may be declared.

The fifth problem with law enforcement is the plague of racial issues. We know the problem with racial matters and how both the rich and poor cannot and are not able to respect the differences of each other. It is like a cat and mouse game where one side tries to steal the lobster from the other when they both know a lobster will not satisfy their hunger. Therefore, the racial bug has bit law enforcement in the posterior end of their head and they are incapable of dealing with the criticisms. Those same criticisms have caused law enforcement personnel to become very disgruntled and with a blackened soul. The racial condition and the blackened soul cause law enforcement to try and buck the system and they use their positions to justify political ends.

As the best soldiers in the world, we know the job and the duties very well. We also know the results and who and what is causing the problems. However, you simply do not use the job or the position to avoid or prevent accountability. Under certain circumstances and under the combat situations, even military people face difficult if not impossible odds. The best you can do sometimes is good enough to satisfy an already imperfect matter. However, the military is not going to sit here and let terrorist come to our soil and attack us, our way of life, our soul, the very basis of why this nation was created and most of all loved ones or friends. This book has outlined the basis of how this world works and how we are entering into a new period of global conflict and global power struggle. For the terrorists who are involved in this power struggle but have yet to get it right or do the right thing; we simply ask them to disband, turn themselves in and cease this onslaught to injure others. If the world of terrorism fails to acknowledge this warning, then the free and just world has no choice but to unleash its new and regrouped military forces to go after them in every part of the world and at any cost possible.

Naturally, the cyber and satellite warfare program would prefer to avoid any conflict but we have endured and taken too much punishment and terror at the hands of the worst in this world for us to advise the leadership of any other alternative. As hostage rescuers we make every effort to talk to the hostage takers, to let them know who we are, what we are fighting for and we try to resolve any differences while seeking answers and explanations. Terrorists do not feel privy to answer any questions while they continue their rampage. They will get in front of a hostage rescuers face and tell them “oh you are good” in the most arrogant and stubborn manner. Hostage rescuers do not break down doors like jack booted pigs in the middle of the night demanding answers and money. We make an effort to resolve the matter peacefully with hostage takers and terrorists; however, after all is said and done we are forced to tell the hostage taker and the terrorist to turn themselves in, disband, back down, release the hostages and face whatever accountable action needed. If that is ignored, then there is no other option and we have exasperated all of our energies and our soul. When you read this book, keep in mind a human being can only take so much punishment before their soul runs out of power. Nobody who is a hostage rescuer ever wants to take that step into the unknown; if they do then they should be removed from their job. However, at some point you must throw the cards down and tell people to leave. They have just stolen everything in your soul and life; there is just nothing left to give them but the truth. If the political left cannot accept the truth, then we as hostage takers have nothing left in our souls to give them except a warning about what needs to be done. If there is a problem of distrust or honesty, then they must state so; however, the reality of this book is rather obvious to the naked eye. We want to see the terrorists all over the world turn themselves in and be sincere in their respect of others or we and the military have no option but to come after them.

As hostage rescuers we have no choice but to tell terrorists to turn themselves in, back done, and release their hostages and to face the charges which brought them to the point of their problems. If terrorists and hostage takers do not turn themselves in, you can bet with absolute certainty the military will not wait for them to knock on their doors. The military must give up at some point and they must come to the realization that these terrorists are so hardened, they will not turn themselves in. They will not back down. They will not cease the process of taking hostages. Law enforcement individuals are not equipped to face this problem, they are actually participating in it; and they are not equipped to react anywhere, anytime and do anyhow. Terrorists are dangerous people who will do what they do and ask “how do you feel” or “how do you think we feel.” This is the entire reason why terrorist engage in terrorist activity in the first place. A terrorist knows full well there is nobody on earth who will say “being a hostage was the most inspiring and growth developing event in my life.” Being a hostage is a nightmare and being a hostage of the left is probably the worst of the worst. The political left is the most powerful, the most forceful and the only group with the most political will in this world. If you become their hostage, you can expect what the outcome will be. There is no military commander on this earth who will disagree with this. The political left is a major problem and they are a huge force in this world. It is a tremendous frustration to deal with this problem and to work in this field.

Most if not all of the time, we see hostage takers and terrorist seeking compromise. They want to work together and to resolve very difficult matters; yet their behavior and their actions do not change. If matters go wrong for them the next day, they are back at it again. Therefore, you have to put yourself in the mind of a terrorist and understand their shirt says “lets work together” when their backs are riddled with bullets. They know firsthand what the problem is. They will storm the offices of others, take them hostage, ramble and vent, then try to make a quiet exit while others are shooting them in the back. They will come back and exploit the situation to their ends, “we were shooting in the back.”

Law enforcement is motivated by different factors then military forces. Military forces do not let terrorism to exist in order to stack the personnel for the problem. Law enforcement, due to the pressures from the community, sometimes sees crime as a spickett. When you turn it on, you get funds and allotments. When you turn it off, you loose the funds and allotments. Therefore, if you want to stack your own forces and your most loyal people in a law enforcement agency, you let the problem exist and you promote it. The same applies with terrorism. If you are a terrorist and you want to stack the security or military with personnel; you take a stand against terrorism while allowing it to go unchecked. It is a small minded but clandestine game we saw in many areas of the world used to various degrees of deception. Several of them ended up with military coups or mutinies. Therefore, terrorists usurp the legitimacy of a ruling body while they take a strong stance against that same ruling body. This is called “mimicking the message” and is a widespread practice on the international scene. “Tic for tac” is also a common tactic of going after the message or the messenger.

As the best soldiers in the world, we are no strangers to coups or attempted coups. We have lived through them and have a lot of experience with them. Coups and insurgencies are researched to the highest levels. This book however is not about coups and insurgencies. This book is about hostage taking and hostage rescue. It is about a new type of warfare and a new threat in this world.

We have to make this very clear and lucid to the terrorists in this world and we must make it very clear we will not work with them or compromise with them. This will set off a horrible chain reaction where other groups will see the necessity of taking additional hostages and seeking absolution or political reform by doing so. As the best soldiers in the world, we see the entire battlefield and have all the fine tuned characteristics which we were trained with to perform our duties. We are not dishonest or cruel people but we must constantly face this threat and be the victims of such. We are under constant pressure and under constant frustration from terrorism which makes quite a successful living out of attacking others and capturing them for their own political ends and reforms. Terrorists like to create scars on their victims then pick at them. This is what they did, have done and are doing to us. We are not socialists and not communists, yet we have to plead for our lives and ask for it.

It is unusual and most suspicious how the past decade has turned out when every single government agency has been notified. The White House has been notified, the Pentagon has been notified, the authorities have been notified and the public has been notified. However, they exist and undergo their daily lives as if blinders are on and this is common practice. So the reaction from these people is very suspicious. The reaction of terrorism and the war on terrorism is suspicious. This is the biggest facet of the matter, how those in the position of power and how those who are charged with the duties to prevent such exist with blinders and how they simply look back with a blank stare. It is grotesque to say the least and it fills the heart and the soul with a degree of hatred no human being wishes to experience. Is this some exercise on American democracy or elections? If so, then it is nothing more than a sick cruel hoax by equally sick and cruel people who will be damned in hell for their participation in such. We do not need another speech; we need to see results, outcomes and this matter resolved. It is just a little suspicious because of the reactions we are discovering behind door number one, two and three.

Some people who are blessed can become overnight sensations while some take an entire lifetime to achieve their goals. This was supposed to be special and it was supposed to be a time period where people lived the happiest moment of their lives. There are things which you cannot buy in life and there are things which can never be replaced or fixed. We can become overnight sensations anytime and anywhere. We cannot however, find ultimate happiness, friendship, true love, peace, and the rejuvenation of youth by living a life free of stress. It took awhile and a little time off after college to let things settle and to let that sense of being yourself come back. You can easily loose yourself in the cyber and satellite warfare program or being the best soldiers in the world. You don’t want to rush things and you want to make sure you are mentally and physically prepared by trying to build a happy life and a happy foundation before becoming an overnight sensation. What the hell happened and who the hell is going to be accountable for this? We needed room to breath and we need room to grow as human beings; what we got was poisonous gas along with our life line cut out from under us. Who in their right mind would volunteer for this insanity by the political left?

As hostage rescuers we have no choice but to tell terrorists to turn themselves in, back done, and release their hostages and to face the charges which brought them to the point of their problems. If terrorists and hostage takers do not turn themselves in, you can bet with absolute certainty the military will not wait for them to knock on their doors. The military must give up at some point and they must come to the realization that these terrorists are so hardened, they will not turn themselves in. They will not back down. They will not cease the process of taking hostages. Terrorists are dangerous people who will do what they do and ask “how do you feel” or “how do you think we feel.” This is the entire reason why terrorist engage in terrorist activity in the first place. A terrorist knows full well there is nobody on earth who will say “being a hostage was the most inspiring and growth developing event in my life.” Being a hostage is a nightmare and being a hostage of the left is probably the worst of the worst. The political left is the most powerful, the most forceful and the only group with the most political will in this world. If you become their hostage, you can expect what the outcome will be. There is no military commander on this earth who will disagree with this. The political left is a major problem and they are a huge force in this world. It is a tremendous frustration to deal with this problem and to work in this field. Ask yourself if you do not see the same problem with your own standard of living and how your life has been complicated by this matter.

It is not a concrete summary to say the right movement cannot achieve results without violating ethical standards, it is more accurate to say how it can be misguided at times and this causes ethical violations. Similarly, this is a struggle for the hearts and minds of the world, therefore, the enemies will try to undermine the effort and use any means possible to wrack up as much ethics violations as possible. The right, influenced by many Christian values, feels the need to reform the left. Reforming others is not a problem; however, when it goes wrong and when it blows up in your face is a major setback.

The right is beset with the problem of an inseparable enemy who will not stop and will not accept their position in life; therefore, the public only sees a person of authority beating back a mob with a bamboo stick when there is much more to this menacing story. Those problems in itself make the right an imperfect mechanism and frequently incurs besmirch of their leaders who know how the left is baiting them into a trap for the hearts and minds of the world. The political left is accustomed to use law enforcement tactics considered to be entrapment because they fail to recognize causation or take personal responsibilities; the only way they can seek a moral ground is to constantly incite while they undermine the same effort. When it comes to economics and financial matters, this is the same strategy which the political left is trapped in. There is no way for them to change the truth or nature; therefore, they must resort to dirty tricks, entrapment, incitement, and baiting others to achieve the slightest goals. This problem with causation and personal responsibility is why they throw matters in the face of others or shove it down their throats, a rather bitter pill to swallow.

The question is how you win the hearts and minds of others, especially hostage rescuers when they lived through the problem? What options do you have when you have no options whatsoever ethically? We know how powerful the political left is and how much of the world they control; the question is what options do you have when you have no options whatsoever ethically? The answer which we tripped over while walking through the park is in this book. Who would have thought such an evil and vile creature could be born out of freedom? We know what and what the left and the right is; we know what they have to do to survive in this world; we just never thought we would be a hostage and involved in a ten year ordeal to free ourselves as hostage rescuers. In the end, the left will loose and our standard of living will drop to a level where the world may be rich but our souls are wounded and parted by grief. Consider how the leaders of the world will feel if they had to live the same experience. Power got the left what they are today and that same power will get them in serious trouble as well. They used their power to fight this and it is going to bite them in the butt just like everything else has bit them in the butt, however, this is a creature who does not learn, cannot adapt, is defiant, reckless and on a path of destruction.

Ask yourself who in their right mind would talk to these people or put themselves in a position with hostage rescuers. It is wonderful how they think they have something special and think they are powerful. This was the same curse every communist nation on earth was plagued with because it is a fallacy. Well, even hostage rescuers are telling you about their experiences and how blasphemous and despicable their job is. Nobody wants to deal with this problem, nobody wants to tackle this threat, and nobody wants to voice any understanding to the matter because there is no political will to do so. If you do not have the political will then you will not have legal justification. This means that everything in this book is legal in the eyes of the courts. This is the most disturbing part of this book, it is the legal system that is or has become a terrorist organization because it must obey the political will nonexistent. Who in their right mind would knock on the doors of terrorists and ask them to take them hostage and to wreck their lives so they can write a book about their experiences? Are hostage rescuers that stupid or crazy? Who in their right mind would want to be in this position currently and why? We did not choose to be in this position; we were forced to be in this position when this powerful leftist cause wanted to shut us up because they were finally brought to justice. They wanted to sidetrack and discourage this matter as if the world had ended, turn the power on full because this will be our last breath. Let’s make it count and if we fail, we have nothing to loose because they are only hostage rescuers.

There are a lot of reasons why people in the world have a tendency to view the United States of America as an evil force and maybe even a force of tyranny. However, what they do not understand is how the United States of America is a hostage of its own circumstances. What they do not understand is how awful the political leadership is and the ability to live and ignore everything which is important to the survival of the nation. This book has tried to outline the problem by taking a snap shot of the history of the cyber and satellite warfare program through the eyes of the father of the program. Keep in mind when this started and what it took to get here. We do not know how long we can hold this position because we are or were under attack daily and our hands were tied completely.

This is a report from National Public Radio show All Things Considered called, ‘As Pace Exits, Critics Attack His War Leadership’ aired on September 27, 2006. This is an excerpt of the ending of the report:

“War Decisions and Assumptions

Pace is not giving interviews. At a Pentagon press conference last week, Pace was asked about some of the decisions that were made, such as disbanding the Iraqi army, now widely seen as one of the greatest blunders of the war.

‘First of all, the Iraqi army was not disbanded. It disintegrated,’ Pace said. ‘If I knew the Iraqi army was not going to be available, then I would have made a different recommendation about the total size of the troops going in.’

It's not entirely true to say that the Iraqi army ‘disintegrated.’ Thousands of Iraqi soldiers came back looking for work. Myers says that in hindsight, the Americans should have found jobs for many more of those Iraqis.

And Pace also admits to shortcomings.

‘So were there errors in assumption? I certainly made the error of assuming the Iraqi army would be there,’ Pace said. ‘In retrospect, you say you wish you knew. But you didn't know on the way in.’

Retired Marine Maj. Gen. Tom Wilkerson says there were many more assumptions — such as how American troops would be received by Iraqis or how Iraqi money would rebuild the country.

‘It would appear that almost 100 percent of them didn't come to pass,’ says Wilkerson.

Rumsfeld's Vision to Blame?

Wilkerson says the real tragedy is that there was no clear thinking about what would happen if those assumptions turned out to be wrong.

As violence increased in Iraq, there were some calls for more American troops to secure the population. Rumsfeld continued to refuse. Wilkerson says that only after Rumsfeld left were U.S. troop levels increased and a new counterinsurgency strategy created.

‘They never looked at it at all until it hit them in the face,’ Wilkerson says.

Pace has his defenders — among them, retired Army Gen. Barry McCaffrey, who has offered blistering criticism of how the war has been managed. He points to Pace as a young officer fighting bravely in the battle of Hue City during the Vietnam War.

McCaffrey says Pace is a man who is loyal and honorable, who cares about the troops. He says the real culprit is the man at the Pentagon who made the final decisions about Iraq: Donald Rumsfeld.

‘Mr. Rumsfeld, with his unbelievable arrogance and bad judgment, has put the country in a position of tremendous strategic peril,’ says McCaffrey.

How Far Can Officers Challenge Civilian Leaders?

The state of the war in Iraq, the blunders and the seeming silence of top officers has led to a serious debate inside the military: What is the role of senior uniformed leaders? Should they be more vocal, perhaps more unvarnished before Congress? Should they go so far as to air their differences of opinion in newspaper op-ed pieces before a final decision is made?

For his part, McCaffrey says that senior officers must be independent advisers, not ones who merely echo their political masters.

‘When testifying before Congress, when Congress says, 'General or admiral, give me your personal judgment,' they're supposed to give their personal judgment, not just mindlessly support Mr. Rumsfeld's bad thinking,’ McCaffrey says.

McCaffrey says Pace ‘was right in the middle of that painful situation.’

Gen. Scales says the debate includes a proper role model for a senior officer.

‘Colin Powell was far more assertive, far more aggressive and resolute in pushing his views on national security,’ says Scales. ‘The consensus is that Peter Pace was the opposite.’

A few days ago, the pain of leaving the top military job was evident as Pace spoke to enlisted soldiers and Marines at the Pentagon. His voice broke as he recalled the friends he lost in Vietnam and the visits he will no longer make to troops in combat.

‘I'm not sad that I'm not going to be chairman anymore, as great an honor as that is,’ Pace said. ‘I'm sad because I won't be able to put the uniform on and, on occasion, get out on the battlefield and hug my fellow service members, and tell them I love them, and thank them for what they are doing for their country.’

Pace will step down Monday at a departure ceremony at Fort Myer, Va., a graceful 19th-century Army base that borders Arlington National Cemetery. Among those in attendance will be his fellow Marines from Vietnam, survivors of the second platoon of Golf Company.”

Here is another report called, ‘Hate Crimes Measure Tied to Defense Spending’ aired on Friday September 28, 2007 from the National Public Radio show Mourning Edition:

“Defying the threat of a presidential veto, the Senate included landmark hate crimes legislation to the annual bill that authorizes defense spending.

No president has ever vetoed such a defense bill, and this one includes both higher pay for the military and better health care for the wounded. Supporters of the hate crimes measure mustered enough support Thursday to defeat a filibuster, but they were still short of the 67 votes needed to override a presidential veto.

Bipartisan Group Seeks Broader Law

For the last decade, a bipartisan group of lawmakers has been trying to broaden a federal hate crimes law to include not only crimes motivated by the victim's race, religion, or national origin, but also physical disability and, in particular, sexual orientation.

The bill has been passed repeatedly, only to die in House-Senate negotiations that were controlled by Republicans. Now, the Democrats are in the majority, so Democratic Sen. Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts set out to add the hate crimes measure to the big defense policy bill now moving through the Senate. It is consistent, Kennedy said, with the ideals U.S. troops are fighting for in Iraq and Afghanistan:

‘They are on the front lines fighting against hate,’ Kennedy said. ‘We're united in our effort to root out the cells of hatred around the world. We should not turn a blind eye to acts of hatred and terrorism here at home. We owe it to our troops to uphold those same principles here at home.’

Bill Focuses on Anti-Gay Crimes

The hate crimes bill is named after Matthew Shepard, the gay Wyoming college student who was found beaten to death nine years ago.

Oregon's Republican Sen. Gordon Smith, who is a co-sponsor, showed his colleagues a large photo of another victim — a sailor who had been beaten almost beyond recognition by fellow U.S. Navy shipmates.

‘The United States military is not immune from hate crimes,’ Smith said. ‘It is utterly, entirely appropriate that this be on the defense authorization bill.

But Republican Sen. John Cornyn of Texas maintained the measure has nothing to do with the defense authorization bill. He argued that crimes should not be considered more or less despicable because of the victim's identity.

‘All crimes of violence are crimes of hate,’ said Cornyn, a strong ally of the White House. ‘All ought to be judged according to the same criteria. All ought to be subject to the same range of punishments, given to juries able to convict people based on evidence produced in court (and) not based on (the) politically correct notion that some crimes are more heinous than others.’

Opponents Say Measures Imperils Military Spending

South Carolina Republican Lindsey Graham insisted that measures the military needs could be in peril if the hate crimes provision becomes part of the defense authorization bill. He predicted the president would not agree to including social legislation on the defense authorization bill, which would jeopardize the needs of the military.

Still, nine Republican senators voted with every Democrat and both of the independents — supplying the 60 votes needed to end a filibuster. The hate crimes measure was then added to the defense bill unanimously by voice vote.

The Senate's defense bill must still be reconciled with the House version. The House approved a stand alone hate crimes bill in May.

If the hate crimes provision remains in the final version of the bill that goes to the White House, it will pose a momentous choice for a president eager to secure another year of defense spending.”

This is the last report aired on the same National Public Radio show All Things Considered called, ‘Myanmar's Unrest Poses Diplomatic Challenges’ on Friday September 28, 2007:

“Soldiers in Myanmar tried to crush dissent Friday by breaking up street gatherings of die-hard activists, occupying key Buddhist monasteries and cutting public Internet access, raising concerns of a wider crackdown after at least 10 people were killed this week.

Troops fired warning shots in the air and hit protesters with clubs to disperse a demonstration by about 2,000 people, witnesses said. The clash in an area near the Sule Pagoda — which has been a focal point of days of anti-government protests — was the most serious of the several sporadic protests that were reported in Myanmar's biggest city.

By sealing Buddhist monasteries, the government seemed intent on clearing the streets of monks, who have spearheaded the demonstrations and are revered by most of their countrymen. With the monks out of the way, the troops could feel they have a freer hand to come down harder on the remaining protesters.

Number of Protesters Dwindles

Daily protests drawing tens of thousands of people had grown into the stiffest challenge to the ruling military junta in two decades, a crisis that began Aug. 19 with rallies against a fuel price hike, then escalated dramatically when monks joined in.

But government efforts to squelch the demonstrations appeared to be working.

Earlier Friday, soldiers and riot police moved quickly to disperse a crowd of 300 that started marching in Yangon, sealing the surrounding neighborhood and ordering them to disperse.

Elsewhere, they fired warning shots to scatter a group of 200.

Bob Davis, Australia's ambassador to Myanmar, said he had heard unconfirmed reports that ‘several multiples of the 10 acknowledged by the authorities’ may have been killed by troops in Yangon.

Scores have been arrested, carted away in trucks at night or pummeled with batons in recent days, witnesses and diplomats said, with the junta ignoring all international appeals for restraint.

Southeast Asian Countries Condemn Violence

The Association of Southeast Asian Nations expressed ‘revulsion’ and told the junta ‘to exercise utmost restraint and seek a political solution.’ Demonstrations against the junta were seen in Malaysia, Thailand, Japan and elsewhere.

But by Myanmar standards, the crackdown has so far been muted, in part because the regime knows that killing monks could trigger a public fury.

Southeast Asian envoys were told by Myanmar authorities Friday that a no-go zone had been declared around five key Buddhist monasteries, one diplomat said, raising fears of a repeat of 1988, when troops gunned down thousands of peaceful demonstrators and imprisoned the survivors.

Gates were locked and key intersections near monasteries in Yangon and Mandalay were sealed off with barbed wire, and there was no sign of monks in the streets.

‘We were told security forces had the monks under control’ and will now turn their attention to civilian protesters, the Asian diplomat said on condition of anonymity, citing protocol.

The government's apparent decision to cut public Internet access — which has played a crucial role in getting news and images of the pro-democracy protests to the outside world — also raised concerns.

Thursday was the most violent day in more than a month of protests — which at their height have brought an estimated 70,000 demonstrators to the streets. Bloody sandals lay scattered on some streets as protesters fled shouting ‘Give us freedom, give us freedom!’“

Under the most stressful conditions, bad people and the wrong people act in a deplorable manner which makes matters not only worse but impossible to fix. This standard of honorable action under fire is one which the military is constantly in judgment and is constantly challenged with. The left has a strategy which is based on the repercussions of their actions. We have slowly tested their willful and intentional actions and misrepresentations to determine it is based on risk and repercussions. They know something is wrong and their actions under stressful conditions are, were and will be deplorable because there are many problems with their personality and character. It is a sense of brokenness which has led us to this point and this conclusion; it is a sense of deplorable behavior which slowly drains the standard of living for the human race.

After you read this book, you must ask what the problem is. We are not dishonest, we are not cruel, we are not socialist, we are not communist; yet our reputation and image has been smeared in a drastic way. What is the problem? Were we supposed to shoot and ask questions later or were we supposed to ask questions then shoot? What is the problem with this chapter and this book? Is it a sense of feebleness or stupidity? Is it an enemy who is just so awesome and powerful, we just are not worthy and smart enough? Are we not narcissistic enough or maybe arrogant enough? What is our problem as hostage rescuers and the leaders of the cyber and satellite warfare program? What is the truth in the problem when we are faced with the issue of shooting first and asking questions later or asking questions first and shooting afterwards? We will let the people who are accountable turn themselves in and answer those questions when the time is appropriate. It is with certain they are of equal wisdom to answer this.

“About Mr. Brown” lyrics by O.A.R.

What can you say about tomorrow?

What can you know about my life?

What do you say to your daughter?

What do you tell to your wife?

La da, day oh…

So Mr. Brown about your daughter,

I think I know where she went tonight.

Do you agree that we are lost here?

Well that’s alright?

Well, among the lost we shall survive.

La da, day oh…

(Sax solo)

What can you say about this weather?

We got a nice day today didn’t we, it was nice?

I feel his soul light as a feather.

Oh my man. A long time ago you went flat out insane.

La da, day oh…

Say Mr. Brown about your brother.

Can you see what he is doing with his life?

The more you push your kids out of the front door.

One day, they are going to come back and askin where is my life.

La da, day oh…

What's that you say? When the rain won't go away?

What's that you know? When no one's looking at you?

Where's that you go after the show?

Wanna say what you do with your life?

(Solo by Rich)

Oh I say Mr. Brown, whatcha been thinking?

I don’t know, what have you been drinking? Ayy oh.

I say your wife, is out on her own while your heart is at home chillin.

You don’t ever have a home. I say…

You see another because she don’t love you no more.

But you want to step out, out that front-front door.

I say, you been dropped down to the bottom of the list, just…

I’ll give you once chance, one chance to resist.

I know Mr. Brown you isn’t coming to the show.

You got no life and you got no soul, any-mo.

So get up and get down, bust your ass to get out of our town.

Bust it around Mr. Brown… Yeah!

(Sax solo)

Say Mr. Brown how about your mother?

Do you see what she's done tonight?

She was seeing all the colors,

But the darkness was out of sight.

“Movies” lyrics by Alien Ant Farm

At slow speed we all seem focused.

In motion we seem wrong.

In summer we can taste the rain.

Chorus:

I want you to be free,

Don't worry about me,

And just like the movies,

We play out our last scene.

Two can play this game.

We both want power.

In winter we can taste the pain.

In our short years, we come long way,

To treat it bad and throw away.

(Chorus)

You won't cry, I won't scream…

In our short years we come long way,

To treat it bad and throw away.

And if we make a little space,

A science fiction showcase.

In our short film, a love disgrace,

Dream a scene to brighten face.

In our short years we come long way,

To treat it bad, just to throw it away.

(Chorus)

“Thanks a Lot” lyrics by Third Eye Blind

It's all in your mind; she said the darkness and the light

The clock, it bleeds for you but you never got the time in right

I woke you up and I slit the throat of your confidence

And we laughed in the night, and I felt alright

Woo!

All hands on deck boys 'cause this ship was made to sink

Your swabber salutes you now, but I know what he's thinking

I woke you up and I slit the throat of your confidence

And we laughed in the night, and I felt alright

(Chorus)

Thanks a lot

Thanks a lot

Don't even know

Thanks a lot

The clothes she wears mis-fit, and she's nervous when she speaks

Her zombie mom and dad live in a separate house of freaks

I woke you up and I slit the throat of your confidence

And we laughed in the night

And I felt alright

(Chorus)

I'm the one for you

'Cause I know all the dirty things you like to do

I'm the fear in your eyes; I'm the fire in your flies

I'm the sound that's buzzing around your head

Day...

Glow...

Thanks a lot

Thanks a lot

Don't even know

Thanks a lot

Thanks a lot…